Why the South African National Health Research Ethics Council is wrong about ownership of human biological material and data.

Journal: Developing world bioethics

Volume: 

Issue: 

Year of Publication: 

Affiliated Institutions: 

Abstract summary 

The South African National Health Research Ethics Council (NHREC) states in its 2024 Ethics Guidelines that human biological material (HBM) and data cannot be privately owned under South African law. This position conflicts with established legal principles, guidelines by the Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA), and South African university policies, all of which support private ownership of HBM and data. Private ownership is not only legally sound but also ethically necessary, providing a framework for accountability, ensuring fair recognition of institutional contributions, and enabling responsible custodianship over these valuable resources. The NHREC's denial of private ownership of HBM and data undermines South African research institutions' ability to control their research assets and leaves them vulnerable to exploitation by foreign entities. The NHREC should issue a corrigendum to delete its incorrect position on private ownership of HBM and data.

Authors & Co-authors:  Thaldar Donrich D Maboea Uyanda U Gooden Amy A

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations : 
Authors :  3
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1111/dewb.12475
SSN : 1471-8847
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Other Terms
South Africa;data;data governance;health research ethics;human biological material;neo‐colonialism;ownership;universities
Study Design
Study Approach
Country of Study
South Africa
Publication Country
England