Investigating the geography of thought across 11 countries: Cross-cultural differences in analytic and holistic cognitive styles using simple perceptual tasks and reaction time modeling.

Journal: Journal of experimental psychology. General

Volume: 

Issue: 

Year of Publication: 

Affiliated Institutions:  Institute of Psychology, Czech Academy of Sciences. Interdisciplinary Research Team on Internet and Society, Faculty of Social Studies, Masaryk University. Department of Social Studies Education, Faculty of Education, Aydin Adnan Menderes University. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Tubingen Center for Mental Health, University Hospital Tubingen. Department of Psychology, College of Social Sciences and Philosophy, University of the Philippines Diliman. Department of Information and Library Studies, Faculty of Arts, Laboratory for Information and Cognitive Sciences, Masaryk University. Department of Psychology, Centre for the Mind, Brain and Learning, Laboratory of Eye-Movements and Reading, National Chengchi University.

Abstract summary 

This article investigates cross-cultural differences in analytic/holistic cognitive styles among participants from 11 countries: Armenia, Australia, Brazil, Bulgaria, Czechia, Germany, Ghana, Philippines, Slovakia, Taiwan, and Türkiye. Using a preregistered design, 993 university students were assessed with three perceptual tasks based on Navon's hierarchical figures and Gottschaldt's embedded figures. Analytic and holistic cognitive styles were estimated using reaction time modeling, specifically a Bayesian four-parameter shifted Wald distribution and a hierarchical linear ballistic accumulator model. The results revealed notable cross-cultural variations in cognitive styles, though these differences did not align with predictions from analytic/holistic cognitive style theory. Countries traditionally characterized as more holistic or analytic did not consistently show the expected cognitive style patterns. Multilevel modeling examined the influence of country-level variables, such as Hofstede's and Schwartz's cultural dimensions. While some dimensions, like individualism and long-term orientation, were associated with both analytic and holistic thinking, many cultural predictors had no significant impact on cognitive styles. Additionally, exploratory latent profile analysis assessed cognitive metastyles, such as flexibility and rigidity, but the findings do not support the presence of a rigidity metastyle. No profiles exhibited a strong preference for one cognitive dimension while showing a low preference for the other. These findings challenge the straightforward application of analytic/holistic theory across diverse cultural contexts and suggest a need for reevaluation of its generalizability. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Authors & Co-authors:  Lacko David D Čeněk Jiří J Arıkan Alaattin A Dresler Thomas T Galang Adrianne John AJ Stachoň Zdeněk Z Šašinková Alžběta A Tsai Jie-Li JL Prošek Tomáš T Ugwitz Pavel P Šašinka Čeněk Č

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations : 
Authors :  11
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1037/xge0001685
SSN : 1939-2222
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Other Terms
Study Design
Exploratory Study
Study Approach
Country of Study
Ghana
Publication Country
United States