Similarities and differences in the functions of non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) across gender non-conforming and cisgender young adults.

Journal: Journal of affective disorders

Volume: 367

Issue: 

Year of Publication: 

Affiliated Institutions:  Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, UK; The Mental Health Foundation, London, UK. Electronic address: nml@cantab.ac.uk. Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK and Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, USA. SA MRC Unit on Risk and Resilience in Mental Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, University of Stellenbosch, South Africa. Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, UK; Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, UK. Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, UK.

Abstract summary 

Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) can be motivated by a broad range of functions and many individuals report multiple reasons for self-injuring. Most NSSI research has involved predominantly female samples and few studies have examined gender similarities and differences in function endorsement.We characterise the prevalence and versatility of NSSI functions within a gender-diverse online sample of cisgender women (cis-women; n = 280), cisgender men (cis-men; n = 176), and transgender, non-binary, and other gender non-conforming young adults (TGNC; n = 80) age 18-30 (M = 23.73, SD = 3.55). The Ottawa Self-Injury Inventory (OSI-F) assessed 24 intrapersonal and social functions across nine domains: affect regulation, self-punishment, anti-dissociation, anti-suicide, sensation seeking, sexuality, interpersonal influence, and body image.TGNC participants and cis-women were significantly more likely to report intrapersonally motivated NSSI and greater function versatility than cis-men. Low mood, emotional distress, suicidality, and trauma symptomology appeared to contribute to gender differences in function endorsement. Gender similarities also emerged; across groups, intrapersonal functions were substantially more common than social functions, and the most endorsed domains were affect regulation and self-punishment. No domains were gender specific.The OSI-F was developed from majority female samples and may not adequately capture the experiences of other gender groups.Interventions which reduce distress and strengthen emotion regulation are likely to benefit individuals who self-injure regardless of gender. However, most individuals report multiple NSSI functions and person-centred interventions which address this complexity are needed. Future research should develop gender-informed treatment models which consider the unique experiences of TGNC individuals and cis-men who self-injure.

Authors & Co-authors:  Lutz Nina M NM Chamberlain Samuel R SR Grant Jon E JE Lochner Christine C Wilkinson Paul O PO Ford Tamsin J TJ Neufeld Sharon A S SAS

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations : 
Authors :  7
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1016/j.jad.2024.08.224
SSN : 1573-2517
Study Population
Men,Women,Female
Mesh Terms
Other Terms
Functions;Gender;NSSI;Non-binary;Self-harm;Transgender
Study Design
Study Approach
Country of Study
Publication Country
Netherlands