Estimating biological age from retinal imaging: a scoping review.

Journal: BMJ open ophthalmology

Volume: 9

Issue: 1

Year of Publication: 2024

Affiliated Institutions:  SAMRC Unit on Risk & Resilience in Mental Disorders, Department of Psychiatry and Neuroscience Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa GRMMIC@myuct.ac.za. SAMRC Unit on Risk & Resilience in Mental Disorders, Department of Psychiatry and Neuroscience Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. Centre for Eye Research Australia, Ophthalmology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields NHS Foundation Trust and The UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdon.

Abstract summary 

The emerging concept of retinal age, a biomarker derived from retinal images, holds promise in estimating biological age. The retinal age gap (RAG) represents the difference between retinal age and chronological age, which serves as an indicator of deviations from normal ageing. This scoping review aims to collate studies on retinal age to determine its potential clinical utility and to identify knowledge gaps for future research.Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist, eligible non-review, human studies were identified, selected and appraised. PubMed, Scopus, SciELO, PsycINFO, Google Scholar, Cochrane, CINAHL, Africa Wide EBSCO, MedRxiv and BioRxiv databases were searched to identify literature pertaining to retinal age, the RAG and their associations. No restrictions were imposed on publication date.Thirteen articles published between 2022 and 2023 were analysed, revealing four models capable of determining biological age from retinal images. Three models, 'Retinal Age', 'EyeAge' and a 'convolutional network-based model', achieved comparable mean absolute errors: 3.55, 3.30 and 3.97, respectively. A fourth model, 'RetiAGE', predicting the probability of being older than 65 years, also demonstrated strong predictive ability with respect to clinical outcomes. In the models identified, a higher predicted RAG demonstrated an association with negative occurrences, notably mortality and cardiovascular health outcomes.This review highlights the potential clinical application of retinal age and RAG, emphasising the need for further research to establish their generalisability for clinical use, particularly in neuropsychiatry. The identified models showcase promising accuracy in estimating biological age, suggesting its viability for evaluating health status.

Authors & Co-authors:  Grimbly Michaela Joan MJ Koopowitz Sheri-Michelle SM Chen Ruiye R Sun Zihan Z Foster Paul J PJ He Mingguang M Stein Dan J DJ Ipser Jonathan J Zhu Zhuoting Z

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Lowsky DJ, Olshansky SJ, Bhattacharya J, et al. Heterogeneity in healthy aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014;69:640–9. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glt162.
Authors :  9
Identifiers
Doi : e001794
SSN : 2397-3269
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Humans
Other Terms
eye (globe);imaging;public health;retina
Study Design
Study Approach
Systemic Review
Country of Study
Publication Country
England