Governance of research involving people with psychosocial disabilities.

Journal: Wellcome open research

Volume: 8

Issue: 

Year of Publication: 

Affiliated Institutions:  London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru, Lima District, Lima Region, Peru. Centre for Bioethics and Research, Ibadan, Nigeria. Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia. Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Abstract summary 

Health-related research with human participants is governed by research ethics regulations in most jurisdictions. Globally, the 2016 International Ethical Guidelines for Health-related Research Involving Humans, published by the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS), are especially influential and widely held as an international standard. The CIOMS guidelines support the inclusion of people with psychosocial disabilities in research and offer clear guidance to promote their recruitment, including by outlining provisions for substitute decision-making. The CIOMS guidelines sit alongside the United Nations' Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). Adopted in 2006 and ratified in 2008, the CRPD offers a robust framework for recognizing the rights of persons with disabilities, including individuals with psychosocial disabilities. Though the CRPD does not explicitly reference research inclusion, its core principles-especially pertaining to the right to universal legal capacity-have clear implications for research ethics governance, specifically with respect to the use of substitute decision-making for research participation. In this paper, we review the extent to which existing research ethics regulations across selected jurisdictions concord with each of these two frameworks, offering first a broad analysis of regulations across 26 African countries, and then exploring two country-specific case studies from Malaysia and Peru. We find that, while many countries' research ethics regulations align with key aspects of the CIOMS guidelines, core principles of the CRPD are absent. Given the shortcomings of existing regulations, we analyse a key point of tension between CIOMS and the CRPD-the right to participate in research-and offer a proposal for revised regulations that aims to bridge this tension and meet the standards of both frameworks.

Authors & Co-authors:  Wickremsinhe Marisha M Carrecedo Sarah S Yakubu Aminu A Yusof Aimi Nadia Mohd ANM Kaur Sharon S

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Appelbaum PS: Saving the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities – from itself. World Psychiatry. 2019;18(1):1–2. 10.1002/wps.20583
Authors :  5
Identifiers
Doi : 231
SSN : 2398-502X
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Other Terms
mental health;psychosocial disability;research ethics;research governance
Study Design
Case Study
Study Approach
Country of Study
Publication Country
England