Antenatal care quality and detection of risk among pregnant women: An observational study in Ethiopia, India, Kenya, and South Africa.

Journal: PLoS medicine

Volume: 21

Issue: 8

Year of Publication: 2024

Affiliated Institutions:  Department of Global Health, The George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health, Washington, DC, United States of America. Department of Family Medicine, Howard College campus, University of KwaZulu-Natal, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India. Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Health Economics Research Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya. Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America. Laterite Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya. School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa. Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya. Department of Health Systems Management and Health Policy, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Department of Public Health Medicine, Howard College campus, University of KwaZulu-Natal, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

Abstract summary 

Antenatal care (ANC) is an essential platform to improve maternal and newborn health (MNH). While several articles have described the content of ANC in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), few have investigated the quality of detection and management of pregnancy risk factors during ANC. It remains unclear whether women with pregnancy risk factors receive targeted management and additional ANC.This observational study uses baseline data from the MNH eCohort study conducted in 8 sites in Ethiopia, India, Kenya, and South Africa from April 2023 to January 2024. A total of 4,068 pregnant women seeking ANC for the first time in their pregnancy were surveyed. We built country-specific ANC completeness indices that measured provision of 16 to 22 recommended clinical actions in 5 domains: physical examinations, diagnostic tests, history taking and screening, counselling, and treatment and prevention. We investigated whether women with pregnancy risks tended to receive higher quality care and we assessed the quality of detection and management of 7 concurrent illnesses and pregnancy risk factors (anemia, undernutrition, obesity, chronic illnesses, depression, prior obstetric complications, and danger signs). ANC completeness ranged from 43% in Ethiopia, 66% in Kenya, 73% in India, and 76% in South Africa, with large gaps in history taking, screening, and counselling. Most women in Ethiopia, Kenya, and South Africa initiated ANC in second or third trimesters. We used country-specific multivariable mixed-effects linear regression models to investigate factors associated with ANC completeness. Models included individual demographics, health status, presence of risk factors, health facility characteristics, and fixed effects for the study site. We found that some facility characteristics (staffing, patient volume, structural readiness) were associated with variation in ANC completeness. In contrast, pregnancy risk factors were only associated with a 1.7 percentage points increase in ANC completeness (95% confidence interval 0.3, 3.0, p-value 0.014) in Kenya only. Poor self-reported health was associated with higher ANC completeness in India and South Africa and with lower ANC completeness in Ethiopia. Some concurrent illnesses and risk factors were overlooked during the ANC visit. Between 0% and 6% of undernourished women were prescribed food supplementation and only 1% to 3% of women with depression were referred to a mental health provider or prescribed antidepressants. Only 36% to 73% of women who had previously experienced an obstetric complication (a miscarriage, preterm birth, stillbirth, or newborn death) discussed their obstetric history with the provider during the first ANC visit. Although we aimed to validate self-reported information on health status and content of care with data from health cards, our findings may be affected by recall or other information biases.In this study, we observed gaps in adherence to ANC standards, particularly for women in need of specialized management. Strategies to maximize the potential health benefits of ANC should target women at risk of poor pregnancy outcomes and improve early initiation of ANC in the first trimester.

Authors & Co-authors:  Arsenault Catherine C Mfeka-Nkabinde Nompumelelo Gloria NG Chaudhry Monica M Jarhyan Prashant P Taddele Tefera T Mugenya Irene I Sabwa Shalom S Wright Katherine K Amboko Beatrice B Baensch Laura L Molla Wondim Gebeyaw G Mthethwa Londiwe L Clarke-Deelder Emma E Yang Wen-Chien WC Kosgei Rose J RJ Purohit Priyanka P Mzolo Nokuzola Cynthia NC Derseh Mebratie Anagaw A Shaw Subhojit S Nega Adiam A Tlou Boikhutso B Fink Günther G Moshabela Mosa M Prabhakaran Dorairaj D Mohan Sailesh S Haile Mariam Damen D Nzinga Jacinta J Getachew Theodros T Kruk Margaret E ME

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  UNICEF. Antenatal care—UNICEF DATA. Available from: https://data.unicef.org/topic/maternal-health/antenatal-care/#:~:text=Globally%2C%20while%2088%20per%20cent,least%20four%20antenatal%20care%20visits. Accessed April 2024.
Authors :  29
Identifiers
Doi : e1004446
SSN : 1549-1676
Study Population
Female,Women
Mesh Terms
Humans
Other Terms
Study Design
Study Approach
Mixed Methods
Country of Study
Kenya
Publication Country
United States