Psychiatrists' experiences of involuntary care in South Africa: dilemmas for practice in challenging contexts.

Journal: Medical humanities

Volume: 

Issue: 

Year of Publication: 

Affiliated Institutions:  Psychology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, Western Cape, South Africa alexfreeman@sun.ac.za. Psychiatry, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, Western Cape, South Africa. Psychology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, Western Cape, South Africa.

Abstract summary 

Providing for people with psychosocial conditions in crisis is a complex and controversial endeavour that has gained significant attention over the past decade. This increased focus is driven by global calls to reduce coercion, including by the United Nations Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, who interpret Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in General Comment 1 to advocate for the replacement of substituted decision-making with supported decision-making. Psychiatrists occupy a central role in determining how to care for and respond to individuals with psychosocial conditions in crisis in the midst of these debates. They must protect the rights of people with psychosocial conditions in crisis and provide appropriate support within challenging and dynamic contexts. This responsibility includes promoting the autonomy of people with psychosocial condition while ensuring their long-term health, safety and well-being.In this study, we conducted a phenomenological analysis with a sample of nine psychiatrists in South Africa to explore their experiences with involuntary care and the complex dilemmas they face in delivering healthcare to individuals with mental health conditions. Our findings indicate that psychiatrists encounter significant challenges in preserving patient autonomy, particularly within the resource-limited context of South Africa. Pervasive stigma and insufficient support infrastructure complicate efforts to prioritise autonomy. At the same time, professionals must address the critical need to ensure the long-term safety and well-being of their patients. The absence of involuntary care can exacerbate a person's vulnerability to community stigma and inadequate community support, posing severe risks to their welfare. Balancing between protecting a person's autonomy and addressing the limitations of support structures creates a complex predicament for mental health professionals, often resulting in feelings of isolation and moral distress among psychiatrists.

Authors & Co-authors:  Freeman Alex Morung AM Asmal Laila L Swartz Leslie L

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations : 
Authors :  3
Identifiers
Doi : medhum-2024-012929
SSN : 1473-4265
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Other Terms
Health policy;human rights;medical ethics/bioethics;psychiatry;psychology
Study Design
Phenomenological Study
Study Approach
Country of Study
South Africa
Publication Country
United States