Towards an assessment of psychosocial work factors in a multi-level mental health intervention in the workplace: results from the MENTUPP pilot-study.

Journal: International archives of occupational and environmental health

Volume: 

Issue: 

Year of Publication: 

Affiliated Institutions:  LUCAS, Centre for Care Research and Consultancy, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium. fotini.tsantila@kuleuven.be. National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark. LUCAS, Centre for Care Research and Consultancy, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium. Research Group Work, Organisational and Personnel Psychology (WOPP-OL), KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium. School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. European Alliance Against Depression, Leipzig, Germany. Department of Population Health, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Phrenos Center of Expertise, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Centre Fòrum Research Unit, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain. National Suicide Research Foundation, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit (NMAHP‑RU), Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK. German Depression Foundation, Leipzig, Germany. Australian Institute for Suicide Research and Prevention, School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.

Abstract summary 

Mental health in the workplace is a growing concern for enterprises and policy makers. MENTUPP is a multi-level mental health intervention implemented in small and medium size enterprises from three work sectors in nine countries. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, delivery, and instruments for the MENTUPP intervention to inform the planning of a clustered randomized controlled trial.We administered items from the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire and the Danish Work Environment Cohort Study measuring psychosocial workplace factors. The questionnaire was answered by 382 participants at baseline, of which 98 participants also answered after six months at follow-up. We calculated mean scores of 19 psychosocial factors at baseline and conducted repeated measures ANOVAs to assess differences in eight psychosocial factors at follow-up. We also examined whether outcomes differed between work sectors and job positions at follow-up.The construction sector and workers with no or a lower leadership role reported more negative working environment factors at baseline. We observed a statistically significant decline in social support from colleagues and social community at work, and a marginally significant decline in justice at work. For the rest of the constructs, we did not observe statistically significant changes.We found significant differences in psychosocial work environment factors among work sectors and job positions at baseline. Contrary to our hypotheses, three psychosocial work environment factors decreased at follow-up. Possible explanations are the utilization of specific psychosocial factors as resources to cope with psychosocial stressors, high participant expectations that were not met by the intervention, insufficient time for structural changes, or the intervention prompting critical evaluations of the work environment. These findings will inform the design and implementation of the forthcoming clustered randomized controlled trial, where they will also be further investigated to validate their significance.

Authors & Co-authors:  Tsantila Fotini F Rugulies Reiner R Coppens Evelien E De Witte Hans H Arensman Ella E Kahar Abdulla A Cerga-Pashoja Arlinda A Corcoran Paul P De Winter Lars L Greiner Birgit B Griffin Eve E Hogg Bridget B Leduc Caleb C Leduc Mallorie M Maxwell Margaret M Reich Hanna H Ross Victoria V Van Audenhove Chantal C Aust Birgit B

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Arensman E, O’Connor C, Leduc C, Griffin E, Cully G, Ni Dhalaigh D et al (2022) Mental Health promotion and intervention in occupational settings: protocol for a pilot study of the MENTUPP intervention. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(2):947
Authors :  20
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1007/s00420-024-02096-6
SSN : 1432-1246
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Other Terms
Evaluation;Theory of Change;Workplace mental health;MENTUPP;Public mental health interventions
Study Design
Cohort Study,Randomized Control Trial
Study Approach
Country of Study
Publication Country
Germany