How to distinguish promotion, prevention and treatment trials in public mental health? Study protocol for the development of the VErona-LUgano Tool (VELUT).

Journal: BMJ open

Volume: 14

Issue: 8

Year of Publication: 2024

Affiliated Institutions:  WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy marianna.purgato@univr.it. Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland. WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. Johns Hopkins University Center on Aging and Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Department of Psychology, Koc University, Istanbul, Türkiye. Lisbon Institute of Global Mental Health, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal. Health Service and Population Research Department, Centre for Global Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College, London, UK. Global Health Section, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark.

Abstract summary 

Promoting mental health, preventing and treating mental disorders are critically important in public health, and many randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluate intervention strategies for these objectives. However, distinguishing promotion from prevention and from treatment RCTs is challenging. A tool to place studies along the promotion-to-treatment continuum in mental health research does not exist, leaving it to researchers and policymakers to decide on how to classify individual RCTs, which hinders evidence synthesis.We present a protocol for the development of a new tool to assist researchers in distinguishing RCTs along the promotion-to-treatment continuum. We will establish a Tool Development Group, and use the Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcome framework to define constructs. We will generate, define, categorise and reduce the items in the tool using qualitative methods, including cognitive interviews and a Delphi exercise. Psychometric evaluation-including unidimensionality, local independence, monotonicity and item homogeneity-will include data collection, scoring, internal consistency checks and factor analysis of the tool's indicators for available RCTs. We will use standard Cohen's kappa statistics to assess the reliability of the tool.This study involves data collection from the already published literature. However, this protocol has been approved by the ethics committee of the Università della Svizzera Italiana (CE 2024 04). The results of the present project will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and at international and national scientific meetings. Training materials for the application of the tool will also be developed and disseminated to the scientific community. The tool and all related implementation materials will be published on a website and will be freely accessible to the public.

Authors & Co-authors:  Purgato Marianna M Albanese Emiliano E Papola Davide D Prina Eleonora E Tedeschi Federico F Gross Alden A Sijbrandij Marit M Acarturk Ceren C Annoni Anna Maria AM Silva Manuela M Jordans Mark J D MJD Lund Crick C Tol Wietse A WA Cuijpers Pim P Barbui Corrado C

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations : 
Authors :  15
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082652
SSN : 2044-6055
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Humans
Other Terms
MENTAL HEALTH;PUBLIC HEALTH;Psychometrics
Study Design
Study Approach
Qualitative
Country of Study
Publication Country
England