Mental health workers' perspectives on the implementation of a peer support intervention in five countries: qualitative findings from the UPSIDES study.

Journal: BMJ open

Volume: 14

Issue: 5

Year of Publication: 2024

Affiliated Institutions:  Department of Psychiatry II, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany maria.haun@uni-ulm.de. Department of Psychiatry II, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany. Department of Social Work, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er-Sheva, Israel. Centre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune, India. Butabika National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda. Department of Health Systems, Impact Evaluation and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. Centre for Global Mental Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Abstract summary 

The introduction of peer support in mental health teams creates opportunities and challenges for both peer and non-peer staff. However, the majority of research on mental health workers' (MHWs) experiences with peer support comes from high-income countries. Using Peer Support In Developing Empowering Mental Health Services (UPSIDES) is an international multicentre study, which aims at scaling up peer support for people with severe mental illness in Europe, Asia and Africa. This study investigates MHWs experiences with UPSIDES peer support.Six focus groups with MHWs were conducted approximately 18 months after the implementation of the UPSIDES peer support intervention. Transcripts were analysed with a descriptive approach using thematic content analysis.Qualitative data were collected in Ulm and Hamburg (Germany), Butabika (Uganda), Dar es Salaam (Tanzania), Be'er Sheva (Israel) and Pune (India).25 MHWs (19 females and 6 males) from UPSIDES study sites in the UPSIDES Trial (ISRCTN26008944) participated.Five overarching themes were identified in MHWs' discussions: MHWs valued peer support workers (PSWs) for sharing their lived experiences with service users (theme 1), gained trust in peer support over time (theme 2) and provided support to them (theme 3). Participants from lower-resource study sites reported additional benefits, including reduced workload. PSWs extending their roles beyond what MHWs perceived as appropriate was described as a challenge (theme 4). Perceptions about PSWs varied based on previous peer support experience, ranging from considering PSWs as equal team members to viewing them as service users (theme 5).Considering local context is essential in order to understand MHWs' views on the cooperation with PSWs. Especially in settings with less prior experience of peer support, implementers should make extra effort to promote interaction between MHWs and PSWs. In order to better understand the determinants of successful implementation of peer support in diverse settings, further research should investigate the impact of contextual factors (eg, resource availability and cultural values).ISRCTN26008944.

Authors & Co-authors:  Haun Maria Hildegard MH Girit Selina S Goldfarb Yael Y Kalha Jasmine J Korde Palak P Kwebiiha Eric E Moran Galia G Mtei Rachel R Niwemuhwezi Jackline J Nixdorf Rebecca R Nugent Lena L Puschner Bernd B Ramesh Mary M Ryan Grace Kathryn GK Slade Mike M Charles Ashleigh A Krumm Silvia S

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Repper J, Carter T. A review of the literature on peer support in mental health services. J Ment Health 2011;20:392–411. 10.3109/09638237.2011.583947
Authors :  17
Identifiers
Doi : e081963
SSN : 2044-6055
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Humans
Other Terms
implementation science;mental health;psychiatry;qualitative research
Study Design
Study Approach
Country of Study
Uganda
Publication Country
England