Relevance of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to Adolescent Health Measurement: A Systematic Mapping of the SDG Framework and Global Adolescent Health Indicators.

Journal: The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine

Volume: 74

Issue: 6S

Year of Publication: 2024

Affiliated Institutions:  Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. Electronic address: emma.wallengren@gmail.com. Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing Department, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research World Health Organization includes the UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Geneva, Switzerland. Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom. Global Adolescent Health Group, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Adolescent Health and Well-being Program, Aboriginal Health Equity Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, Centre for Adolescent Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy and Odontology/Gynecology, University Cheikh Anta Diop of Dakar, Dakar, Senegal; Obstetrics Clinic, University Teaching Hospital A. Le Dantec, Dakar, Senegal. Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing Department, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Abstract summary 

To assess the relevance of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) framework for adolescent health measurement, both in terms of age disaggregation and different health domains captured, and how the adolescent health indicators recommended by the Global Action for Measurement of Adolescent Health (GAMA) can complement the SDG framework.We conducted a desk review to systematically map all 248 SDG indicators using the UN metadata repository in three steps: 1) age-related mandates for SDG reporting; 2) linkages between the SDG indicators and priority areas for adolescent health measurement; 3) comparison between the GAMA indicators and the SDG framework.Of the 248 SDG indicators, 35 (14%) targeted an age range overlapping with adolescence (10-19 years) and 33 (13%) called for age disaggregation. Only one indicator (3.7.2 "adolescent birth rate") covered the entire 10-19 age range. Almost half (41%) of the SDG indicators were directly related to adolescent health, but only 33 of those (13% of all SDG indicators) overlapped with the ages 10-19, and 15 (6% of all SDG indicators) explicitly mandated age disaggregation. Among the 47 GAMA indicators, five corresponded to existing SDG indicators, and eight were adolescent-specific age adaptations. Several GAMA indicators shed light on aspects not tracked in the SDG framework, such as obesity, mental health, physical activity, and bullying among 10-19-year-olds.Adolescent health cannot be monitored comprehensively with the SDG framework alone. The GAMA indicators complement this framework via age-disaggregated adaptations and by tracking aspects of adolescent health currently absent from the SDGs.

Authors & Co-authors:  Wallengren Emma E Guthold Regina R Newby Holly H Moller Ann-Beth AB Marsh Andrew D AD Fagan Lucy L Azzopardi Peter P Ba Mariame Guèye MG Kågesten Anna E AE

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations : 
Authors :  9
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.01.004
SSN : 1879-1972
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Humans
Other Terms
Adolescence;Adolescent health;Global health;Health status indicators;Measurement;Sustainable development goals;Youth health
Study Design
Study Approach
Country of Study
Publication Country
United States