Facilitators and barriers to adolescent participation in a TB clinical trial.

Journal: The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease

Volume: 28

Issue: 5

Year of Publication: 2024

Affiliated Institutions:  Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA. Bureau of Tuberculosis Control, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, NY. Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA, Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education. Treatment Action Group, New York, NY, USA. Uganda-Case Western Reserve University Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda. UTHSCSA & San Antonio Veterans Administration Medical Center, TX, USA. Family Centre for Research with Ubuntu, University of Stellenbosch, Capetown, South Africa. Les Centres GHESKIO, Port Au Prince, Haïti. Uganda National Council for Science and Technology, Kampala, Uganda. International Community of Women Living with HIV Eastern Africa, Bujumbura, Burundi. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE. UCSF Center for Tuberculosis, University of California, San Francisco, CA. Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.

Abstract summary 

BACKGROUNDThe inclusion of adolescents in TB drug trials is essential for the development of safe, child-friendly regimens for the prevention and treatment of TB. TB Trials Consortium Study 31/AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5349 (S31/A5349) enrolled adolescents as young as 12 years old. We assessed investigator and coordinator described facilitators and barriers to adolescent recruitment, enrollment, and retention.METHODSInterviews were conducted with six investigators from sites that enrolled adolescent participants and six investigators from non-enrolling sites. Additionally, two focus groups were conducted with study coordinators from enrolling sites and two focus groups with non-enrolling sites. Discussions were transcribed, analyzed, summarized, and summaries were reviewed by Community Research Advisors Group members and research group representatives for content validity.RESULTSInvestigators and coordinators attributed the successful enrollment of adolescents to the establishment and cultivation of external partnerships, flexibility to accommodate adolescents' schedules, staff engagement, recruitment from multiple locations, dedicated recruitment staff working onsite to access potential participants, creation of youth-friendly environments, and effective communications. Non-enrolling sites were mainly hindered by regulations. Suggestions for improvement in future trials focused on study planning and site preparations.CONCLUSIONProactive partnerships and collaboration with institutions serving adolescents helped identify and reduce barriers to their inclusion in this trial..

Authors & Co-authors:  Mangan J M JM Hedges K N C KNC Salerno M M MM Tatum K K Bouwkamp B B Frick M W MW McKenna L L Muzanyi G G Engle M M Coetzee J J Yvetot J J Elskamp M M Lamunu D D Tizora M E Theunissen MET Namutamba D D Chaisson R E RE Swindells S S Nahid P P Dorman S E SE Kurbatova E E

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations : 
Authors :  20
Identifiers
Doi : 10.5588/ijtld.23.0519
SSN : 1815-7920
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Humans
Other Terms
Study Design
Study Approach
Country of Study
Publication Country
France