"We Are Not Really Marketing Mental Health": Mental Health Advocacy in Zimbabwe.

Journal: PloS one

Volume: 11

Issue: 9

Year of Publication: 2017

Affiliated Institutions:  Arnhold Institute for Global Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States. Kushinga, Harare, Zimbabwe. Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom. Department of Psychiatry, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Abstract summary 

Few people with mental disorders in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) receive treatment, in part because mental disorders are highly stigmatized and do not enjoy priority and resources commensurate with their burden on society. Advocacy has been proposed as a means of building political will and community support for mental health and reducing stigma, but few studies have explored the practice and promise of advocacy in LMICs.We conducted 30 semi-structured interviews with leaders in health and mental health in Zimbabwe to explore key stakeholder perceptions on the challenges and opportunities of the country's mental health system. We coded the transcripts using the constant comparative method, informed by principles of grounded theory. Few interview questions directly concerned advocacy, yet in our analysis, advocacy emerged as a prominent, cross-cutting theme across participants and interview questions.Two thirds of the respondents discussed advocacy, often in depth, returning to the concept throughout the interview and emphasizing their belief in advocacy's importance. Participants described six distinct components of advocacy: the advocates, to whom they advocate ("targets"), what they advocate for ("asks"), how advocates reach their targets ("access"), how they make their asks ("arguments"), and the results of their advocacy ("outcomes").Despite their perception that mental health is widely misunderstood and under-appreciated in Zimbabwe, respondents expressed optimism that strategically speaking out can reduce stigma and increase access to care. Key issues included navigating hierarchies, empowering service users to advocate, and integrating mental health with other health initiatives. Understanding stakeholder perceptions sets the stage for targeted development of mental health advocacy in Zimbabwe and other LMICs.

Authors & Co-authors:  Hendler Reuben R Kidia Khameer K Machando Debra D Crooks Megan M Mangezi Walter W Abas Melanie M Katz Craig C Thornicroft Graham G Semrau Maya M Jack Helen H

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Whiteford HA, Degenhardt L, Rehm J, Baxter AJ, Ferrari AJ, Erskine HE, et al. Global burden of disease attributable to mental and substance use disorders: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2013;382(9904): 1575–86. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61611-6
Authors :  10
Identifiers
Doi : e0161860
SSN : 1932-6203
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Consumer Advocacy
Other Terms
Study Design
Grounded Theory
Study Approach
Country of Study
Zimbabwe
Publication Country
United States