Acceptability of multiple modalities of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among female sex workers in Tanzania: a mixed-methods study.

Journal: BMJ open

Volume: 12

Issue: 8

Year of Publication: 2022

Affiliated Institutions:  Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA s.wilson.beckham@jhu.edu. Phia Consulting, New York, New York, USA. Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Psychiatry and Mental Health, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, United Republic of. Department of Prevention and Community Health, George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health, Washington, DC, USA.

Abstract summary 

Modalities of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention offer options to women at high risk including female sex workers (FSW). This study aimed to explore FSW's acceptability and preferences for oral pills, long-acting (LA) injectable and vaginal ring PrEP.Sequential, explanatory, mixed methods.Iringa, Tanzania.FSW aged above 18 were recruited from sex work venues using time-location sampling (n=496); HIV-uninfected (n=293) were included in this analysis. Subsequently, survey participants were recruited for in-depth interviews (n=10) and two focus group discussions (n=20).(1) Acceptability of PrEP (Do you personally think it would be worth it to you to take ART if it could prevent HIV?: yes/no) and (2) preference for LA injectable versus oral pills (If you personally were going to take ART to prevent HIV infection, would you prefer to take it in the form of a daily pill or an injection once every 3 months? Injection/pill).Participants were (92%) unaware of PrEP but 58% thought it would be worth it to personally take PrEP. Acceptability of PrEP was significantly associated with higher social cohesion (aOR 2.12; 95% CI 1.29 to 3.50) and STI symptoms in the past 6 months (aOR 2.52; 95% CI 1.38 to 4.62). Most (88%) preferred LA vs oral PrEP. Qualitative findings revealed generally positive reactions to all types of PrEP, and they were viewed as a welcome backup to condoms. Participants had concerns about pills (burden of daily use, stigma from clients), and the vaginal ring (fear of client noticing and becoming suspicious, fear of infertility) and overall preferred LA-PrEP (less frequent use, easy to hide, belief in higher efficacy).Offering multiple formulations of PrEP within the context of community-driven HIV prevention interventions among FSW may facilitate increased uptake and adherence. LA injectable PrEP may be a particularly preferred formulation among FSW.NCT02281578.

Authors & Co-authors:  Beckham S Wilson SW Mantsios Andrea A Galai Noya N Likindikoki Samuel S Mbwambo Jessie J Davis Wendy W Kerrigan Deanna D

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Shannon K, Crago A-L, Baral SD, et al. . The global response and unmet actions for HIV and sex workers. Lancet 2018;392:698–710. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31439-9
Authors :  7
Identifiers
Doi : e058611
SSN : 2044-6055
Study Population
Women,Female
Mesh Terms
Adult
Other Terms
HIV & AIDS;PREVENTIVE MEDICINE;PUBLIC HEALTH
Study Design
Study Approach
,Qualitative,Mixed Methods
Country of Study
Tanzania
Publication Country
England