A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of community and population interventions to reduce the modifiable risk factors for dementia.

Journal: Maturitas

Volume: 166

Issue: 

Year of Publication: 2023

Affiliated Institutions:  Cambridge Public Health, University of Public Health, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB SR, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Electronic address: Sjw@medschl.cam.ac.uk. Institute of Mental Health, Jubilee Campus, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham NG TU, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, London WT BN, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX GG, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter EX HZ, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Epidemiology Research Unit, Caribbean Institute for Health Research, The University of the West Indies, Mona Campus, Kingston , Jamaica. University of Cambridge Medical School Library, School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge CB SP, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. UNSW Ageing Futures Institute, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Sydney , Australia; Neuroscience Research Australia, Barker Street, Randwick, NSW , Australia. London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London WCA AE, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Cambridge Public Health, University of Public Health, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB SR, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Abstract summary 

Dementia is a leading global cause of morbidity and mortality. Evidence suggests that tackling modifiable lifecourse risk factors could prevent or delay a significant proportion of cases. Population- and community-based approaches change societal conditions such that everyone across a given community is more likely to live more healthily. We systematically reviewed economic studies of population- and community-based interventions to reduce modifiable lifecourse risk factors for dementia. We searched Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Scopus, Econlit, ERIC, the British Education Index, and Google, on 03/03/2022. We included cost-effectiveness, cost-benefit, and cost-utility studies, provided that the direct outcome of the intervention was a modifiable risk factor for dementia, and was measured empirically. Quality appraisal was completed using the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria checklist. A narrative synthesis was performed. We included 45 studies, from 22,749 records identified. Included studies targeted smoking (n = 15), education (n = 10), physical inactivity (n = 9), obesity (n = 5), air pollution (n = 2), traumatic brain injury (n = 1), and multiple risk factors (n = 3). Intervention designs included changing the physical/food environment (n = 13), mass media programmes (n = 11), reducing financial barriers or increasing resources (n = 10), whole-community approaches (n = 6), and legislative change (n = 3). Overall, interventions were highly cost-effective and/or cost-saving, particularly those targeting smoking, educational attainment, and physical inactivity. Effects were observed in high- (e.g. USA and UK) and low- and middle-income (e.g. Mexico, Tanzania, Thailand) countries. Further research into the direct effects of targeting these risk factors on future dementia prevalence will have important economic, social and policy implications.

Authors & Co-authors:  Walsh Sebastian S Brain Jacob J Mukadam Naaheed N Anderson Robert R Greene Leanne L Govia Ishtar I Kuhn Isla I Anstey Kaarin J KJ Knapp Martin M Stephan Blossom C M BCM Brayne Carol C

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations : 
Authors :  11
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1016/j.maturitas.2022.09.002
SSN : 1873-4111
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Humans
Other Terms
Cost-effectiveness;Dementia;Population interventions;Prevention
Study Design
Narrative Study
Study Approach
,Systemic Review
Country of Study
Tanzania
Publication Country
Ireland