Outcome context-dependence is not WEIRD: Comparing reinforcement- and description-based economic preferences worldwide.

Journal: Research square

Volume: 

Issue: 

Year of Publication: 

Affiliated Institutions:  Human Reinforcement Learning Team, Laboratory of Cognitive and Computational Neuroscience, ENS-PSL, Paris, France. Intercultural Cognitive Network. Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel. Facultad de Psicología, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago de Chile, Chile. International Laboratory for Social Neurobiology, Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, HSE University, Moscow, Russia. Faculty of Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan. School of Collective Intelligence, Universite Mohammed VI Polytechnique, Rabat, Morocco. Laboratorio de Neurociencia, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella, Buenos Aires, Argentina. School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences and Beijing Key Laboratory of behaviour and Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing, China. IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Abstract summary 

Recent evidence indicates that reward value encoding in humans is highly context-dependent, leading to suboptimal decisions in some cases. But whether this computational constraint on valuation is a shared feature of human cognition remains unknown. To address this question, we studied the behavior of individuals from across 11 countries of markedly different socioeconomic and cultural makeup using an experimental approach that reliably captures context effects in reinforcement learning. Our findings show that all samples presented evidence of similar sensitivity to context. Crucially, suboptimal decisions generated by context manipulation were not explained by risk aversion, as estimated through a separate description-based choice task (i.e., lotteries) consisting of matched decision offers. Conversely, risk aversion significantly differed across countries. Overall, our findings suggest that context-dependent reward value encoding is a hardcoded feature of human cognition, while description-based decision-making is significantly sensitive to cultural factors.

Authors & Co-authors:  Anlló Hernán H Bavard Sophie S Benmarrakchi FatimaZzahra F Bonagura Darla D Cerrotti Fabien F Cicue Mirona M Gueguen Maelle M Guzmán Eugenio José EJ Kadieva Dzerassa D Kobayashi Maiko M Lukumon Gafari G Sartorio Marco M Yang Jiong J Zinchenko Oksana O Bahrami Bahador B Concha Jaime Silva JS Hertz Uri U Konova Anna B AB Li Jian J O'Madagain Cathal C Navajas Joaquin J Reyes Gabriel G Sarabi-Jamab Atiye A Shestakova Anna A Sukumaran Bhasi B Watanabe Katsumi K Palminteri Stefano S

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Ruggeri K., Alí S., Berge M. L., Bertoldo G., Bjørndal L. D., Cortijos-Bernabeu A., Davison C., Demić E., Esteban-Serna C., Friedemann M., Gibson S. P., Jarke H., Karakasheva R., Khorrami P. R., Kveder J., Andersen T. L., Lofthus I. S., McGill L., Nieto A. E., Pérez J., … Folke T. (2020). Replicating patterns of prospect theory for decision under risk. Nature human behaviour, 4(6), 622–633. 10.1038/s41562-020-0886-x
Authors :  27
Identifiers
Doi : rs.3.rs-2621222
SSN : 
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Other Terms
Study Design
Study Approach
Country of Study
Publication Country
United States