Self Help Plus: study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled trial of guided self-help with South Sudanese refugee women in Uganda.

Journal: Global mental health (Cambridge, England)

Volume: 5

Issue: 

Year of Publication: 

Affiliated Institutions:  War Child Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. HealthRight International, New York, NY. Institute of Psychology Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. Public Health Section, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Geneva, Switzerland. School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada. Department of Reproductive Health & Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Abstract summary 

Exposure to armed conflict and forced displacement constitute significant risks for mental health. Existing evidence-based psychological interventions have limitations for scaling-up in low-resource humanitarian settings. The WHO has developed a guided self-help intervention, Self Help Plus (SH+), which is brief, implemented by non-specialists, and designed to be delivered to people with and without specific mental disorders. This paper outlines the study protocol for an evaluation of the SH+ intervention in northern Uganda, with South Sudanese refugee women.A two-arm, single-blind cluster-randomised controlled trial will be conducted in 14 villages in Rhino Camp refugee settlement, with at least 588 women experiencing psychological distress. Villages will be randomly assigned to receive either SH+ with enhanced usual care (EUC), or EUC alone. SH+ is a five-session guided self-help intervention delivered in workshops with audio-recorded materials and accompanying pictorial guide. The primary outcome is reduction in overall psychological distress over time, with 3 months post-treatment as the primary end-point. Secondary outcomes are self-defined psychosocial concerns, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms, hazardous alcohol use, feelings of anger, interethnic relations, psychological flexibility, functional impairment and subjective wellbeing. Psychological flexibility is a hypothesised mediator, and past trauma history and intervention attendance will be explored as potential moderators.This trial will provide important information on the effectiveness of a scalable, guided self-help intervention for improving psychological health and wellbeing among people affected by adversity.ISRCTN50148022; registered 13/03/2017.

Authors & Co-authors:  Brown F L FL Carswell K K Augustinavicius J J Adaku A A Leku M R MR White R G RG Ventevogel P P Kogan C S CS García-Moreno C C Bryant R A RA Musci R J RJ van Ommeren M M Tol W A WA

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  A-Tjak J, Davis M, Morina N, Powers M, Smits J, Emmelkamp P (2015). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for clinically relevant mental and physical health problems. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 84, 30–36.
Authors :  13
Identifiers
Doi : e27
SSN : 2054-4251
Study Population
Women
Mesh Terms
Other Terms
Armed conflict;humanitarian emergencies;interventions;mental health;psychological intervention;trial protocol
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Country of Study
Uganda
Publication Country
England