A systematic review of influences on implementation of peer support work for adults with mental health problems.

Journal: Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology

Volume: 55

Issue: 3

Year of Publication: 2020

Affiliated Institutions:  School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG TU, UK. Department of Psychiatry, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. Centre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune, India. Butabika National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda. Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel. Department of Psychiatry II, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania. Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, UK. School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG TU, UK. m.slade@nottingham.ac.uk.

Abstract summary 

The evidence base for peer support work in mental health is established, yet implementation remains a challenge. The aim of this systematic review was to identify influences which facilitate or are barriers to implementation of mental health peer support work.Data sources comprised online databases (n = 11), journal table of contents (n = 2), conference proceedings (n = 18), peer support websites (n = 2), expert consultation (n = 38) and forward and backward citation tracking. Publications were included if they reported on implementation facilitators or barriers for formal face-to-face peer support work with adults with a mental health problem, and were available in English, French, German, Hebrew, Luganda, Spanish or Swahili. Data were analysed using narrative synthesis. A six-site international survey [Germany (2 sites), India, Israel, Tanzania, Uganda] using a measure based on the strongest influences was conducted. The review protocol was pre-registered (Prospero: CRD42018094838).The search strategy identified 5813 publications, of which 53 were included. Fourteen implementation influences were identified, notably organisational culture (reported by 53% of papers), training (42%) and role definition (40%). Ratings on a measure using these influences demonstrated preliminary evidence for the convergent and discriminant validity of the identified influences.The identified influences provide a guide to implementation of peer support. For services developing a peer support service, organisational culture including role support (training, role clarity, resourcing and access to a peer network) and staff attitudes need to be considered. The identified influences provide a theory base to prepare research sites for implementing peer support worker interventions.

Authors & Co-authors:  Ibrahim Nashwa N Thompson Dean D Nixdorf Rebecca R Kalha Jasmine J Mpango Richard R Moran Galia G Mueller-Stierlin Annabel A Ryan Grace G Mahlke Candelaria C Shamba Donat D Puschner Bernd B Repper Julie J Slade Mike M

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Dec 1;69(12):1222-1229
Authors :  13
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1007/s00127-019-01739-1
SSN : 1433-9285
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Adult
Other Terms
Consumer–provider;Implementation;Mental health;Peer support;Systematic review
Study Design
Narrative Study,Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Systemic Review
Country of Study
Uganda
Publication Country
Germany