Evaluation of a savings-led family-based economic empowerment intervention for AIDS-affected adolescents in Uganda: A four-year follow-up on efficacy and cost-effectiveness.

Journal: PloS one

Volume: 14

Issue: 12

Year of Publication: 2020

Affiliated Institutions:  College of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America. International Center for Child Health and Development, Brown School, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States of America. Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.

Abstract summary 

Children who have lost a parent to HIV/AIDS, known as AIDS orphans, face multiple stressors affecting their health and development. Family economic empowerment (FEE) interventions have the potential to improve these outcomes and mitigate the risks they face. We present efficacy and cost-effectiveness analyses of the Bridges study, a savings-led FEE intervention among AIDS-orphaned adolescents in Uganda at four-year follow-up.Intent-to-treat analyses using multilevel models compared the effects of two savings-led treatment arms: Bridges (1:1 matched incentive) and BridgesPLUS (2:1 matched incentive) to a usual care control group on the following outcomes: self-rated health, sexual health, and mental health functioning. Total per-participant costs for each arm were calculated using the treatment-on-the-treated sample. Intervention effects and per-participant costs were used to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).Among 1,383 participants, 55% were female, 20% were double orphans. Mean age was 12 years at baseline. At 48-months, BridgesPLUS significantly improved self-rated health, (0.25, 95% CI 0.06, 0.43), HIV knowledge (0.21, 95% CI 0.01, 0.41), self-concept (0.26, 95% CI 0.09, 0.44), and self-efficacy (0.26, 95% CI 0.09, 0.43) and lowered hopelessness (-0.28, 95% CI -0.43, -0.12); whereas Bridges improved self-rated health (0.26, 95% CI 0.08, 0.43) and HIV knowledge (0.22, 95% CI 0.05, 0.39). ICERs ranged from $224 for hopelessness to $298 for HIV knowledge per 0.2 standard deviation change.Most intervention effects were sustained in both treatment arms at two years post-intervention. Higher matching incentives yielded a significant and lasting effect on a greater number of outcomes among adolescents compared to lower matching incentives at a similar incremental cost per unit effect. These findings contribute to the evidence supporting the incorporation of FEE interventions within national social protection frameworks.

Authors & Co-authors:  Tozan Yesim Y Sun Sicong S Capasso Ariadna A Shu-Huah Wang Julia J Neilands Torsten B TB Bahar Ozge Sensoy OS Damulira Christopher C Ssewamala Fred M FM

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  World Health Organization. Health for the world’s adolescents: A second chance in the second decade. 2014 [cited 2019 January 9]. http://apps.who.int/adolescent/second-decade/.
Authors :  8
Identifiers
Doi : e0226809
SSN : 1932-6203
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
Other Terms
Study Design
Case Control Trial,Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Country of Study
Uganda
Publication Country
United States