Peer support for people with severe mental illness versus usual care in high-, middle- and low-income countries: study protocol for a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial (UPSIDES-RCT).

Journal: Trials

Volume: 21

Issue: 1

Year of Publication: 2021

Affiliated Institutions:  The Charlotte B. and Jack J. Spitzer Department of Social Work, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er Sheva, Israel. galiam@bgu.ac.il. Centre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune, India. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy II, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany. School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. Butabika National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda. Centre for Global Mental Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. The Charlotte B. and Jack J. Spitzer Department of Social Work, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er Sheva, Israel. Institute for Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.

Abstract summary 

Peer support is an established intervention involving a person recovering from mental illness supporting others with mental illness. Peer support is an under-used resource in global mental health. Building upon comprehensive formative research, this study will rigorously evaluate the impact of peer support at multiple levels, including service user outcomes (psychosocial and clinical), peer support worker outcomes (work role and empowerment), service outcomes (cost-effectiveness and return on investment), and implementation outcomes (adoption, sustainability and organisational change).UPSIDES-RCT is a pragmatic, parallel-group, multicentre, randomised controlled trial assessing the effectiveness of using peer support in developing empowering mental health services (UPSIDES) at four measurement points over 1 year (baseline, 4-, 8- and 12-month follow-up), with embedded process evaluation and cost-effectiveness analysis. Research will take place in a range of high-, middle- and low-income countries (Germany, UK, Israel, India, Uganda and Tanzania). The primary outcome is social inclusion of service users with severe mental illness (N = 558; N = 93 per site) at 8-month follow-up, measured with the Social Inclusion Scale. Secondary outcomes include empowerment (using the Empowerment Scale), hope (using the HOPE scale), recovery (using Stages of Recovery) and health and social functioning (using the Health of the Nations Outcome Scales). Mixed-methods process evaluation will investigate mediators and moderators of effect and the implementation experiences of four UPSIDES stakeholder groups (service users, peer support workers, mental health workers and policy makers). A cost-effectiveness analysis examining cost-utility and health budget impact will estimate the value for money of UPSIDES peer support.The UPSIDES-RCT will explore the essential components necessary to create a peer support model in mental health care, while providing the evidence required to sustain and eventually scale-up the intervention in different cultural, organisational and resource settings. By actively involving and empowering service users, UPSIDES will move mental health systems toward a recovery orientation, emphasising user-centredness, community participation and the realisation of mental health as a human right.ISRCTN, ISRCTN26008944. Registered on 30 October 2019.

Authors & Co-authors:  Moran Galia S GS Kalha Jasmine J Mueller-Stierlin Annabel S AS Kilian Reinhold R Krumm Silvia S Slade Mike M Charles Ashleigh A Mahlke Candelaria C Nixdorf Rebecca R Basangwa David D Nakku Juliet J Mpango Richard R Ryan Grace G Shamba Donat D Ramesh Mary M Ngakongwa Fileuka F Grayzman Alina A Pathare Soumitra S Mayer Benjamin B Puschner Bernd B

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Repper J, Perkins R. Social inclusion and recovery: a model for mental health practice. Edinburgh: Baillière Tindall; 2003.
Authors :  20
Identifiers
Doi : 371
SSN : 1745-6215
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Adolescent
Other Terms
Cost-effectiveness analysis;Global mental health;Implementation science;Peer support;Pragmatic randomised controlled trial;Process evaluation;Severe mental illness
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Country of Study
Uganda
Publication Country
England