Mental health workers' perspectives on peer support in high-, middle- and low income settings: a focus group study.

Journal: BMC psychiatry

Volume: 22

Issue: 1

Year of Publication: 2022

Affiliated Institutions:  Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy II, Ulm University, Ulm/Guenzburg, Germany. silvia.krumm@uni-ulm.de. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy II, Ulm University, Ulm/Guenzburg, Germany. School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. Centre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune, India. Butabika National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. Centre for Global Mental Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Department of Health Systems, Impact Evaluation and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Bob Shapell School of Social Work, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. Department of Social Work, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er Sheva, Israel.

Abstract summary 

Peer support is increasingly acknowledged as an integral part of mental health services around the world. However, most research on peer support comes from high-income countries, with little attention to similarities and differences between different settings and how these affect implementation. Mental health workers have an important role to play in integrating formal peer support into statutory services, and their attitudes toward peer support can represent either a barrier to or facilitator of successful implementation. Thus, this study investigates mental health workers' attitudes toward peer support across a range of high- (Germany, Israel), middle- (India), and low-income country (Tanzania, Uganda) settings.Six focus groups were conducted in Ulm and Hamburg (Germany), Butabika (Uganda), Dar es Salaam (Tanzania), Be'er Sheva (Israel), and Ahmedabad, Gujarat (India) with a total of 35 participants. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic content analysis.Participants across the study sites demonstrated overall positive attitudes towards peer support in mental health care, although some concerns were raised on potentially harmful effects of peer support such as negative role modelling and giving inadequate advice to service users. Notably, mental health workers from low- and middle-income countries described peer support workers as bridge-builders and emphasized the mutual benefits of peer support. Mental health workers' views on peer support workers' roles and role boundaries differed between sites. In some settings, mental health workers strongly agreed on the need for role clarity, whereas in others, mental health workers expressed mixed views, with some preferring blurred role boundaries. Regarding collaboration, mental health workers described peer support workers as supporters and utilizers, equal partners or emphasized a need for trust and commitment.Mental health workers' attitudes toward peer support workers were positive overall, but they also varied depending on local context, resources and previous experiences with peer support. This affected their conceptions of peer support workers' roles, role clarity, and collaboration. This study demonstrated that reconciling the need for local adaptations and safeguarding the core values of peer support is necessary and possible, especially when the implementation of recovery-oriented interventions such as peer support is accelerating worldwide.

Authors & Co-authors:  Krumm Silvia S Haun Maria M Hiller Selina S Charles Ashleigh A Kalha Jasmine J Niwemuhwezi Jackie J Nixdorf Rebecca R Puschner Bernd B Ryan Grace G Shamba Donat D Epstein Paula Garber PG Moran Galia G

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Fuhr DC, Salisbury TT, Silva MJ de, Atif N, van Ginneken N, Rahman A et al. Effectiveness of peer-delivered interventions for severe mental illness and depression on clinical and psychosocial outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2014; 49(11):1691–1702. 10.1007/s00127-014-0857-5.
Authors :  12
Identifiers
Doi : 604
SSN : 1471-244X
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Focus Groups
Other Terms
Focus groups;High-, middle- and low income settings;Mental health workers;Peer support
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Mixed Methods
Country of Study
Uganda
Publication Country
England