Capacity to Consent to Research Among Adolescent-Parent Dyads in Rakai, Uganda.

Journal: The Journal of pediatrics

Volume: 257

Issue: 

Year of Publication: 2023

Affiliated Institutions:  HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, New York, NY. Electronic address: pk@cumc.columbia.edu. HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, New York, NY; Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY. Rakai Health Sciences Program, Kalisizo, Uganda. Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY. Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY. Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY. Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.

Abstract summary 

To assess the cognitive capacity of early, middle, and late adolescents and their parents or guardians to provide informed consent to a population-based cohort study.Adolescent-parent/guardian dyads including 40 early (n = 80; 10-14 years), 20 middle (15-17 years), and 20 late (18-19 years) adolescents were recruited from the Rakai Community Cohort Study, an open demographic cohort in Uganda. Participants were administered the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Clinical Research, a structured open-ended assessment; interviews were recorded and transcribed. Twenty transcripts were scored independently by two coders; the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.89. The remaining interviews were scored individually. We compared mean scores for early and middle/late adolescents using a one-sided t test and score differences between parent/guardian and adolescent dyads using two-sided paired t tests.Early adolescents (mean score, 28.8; 95% CI, 27.1-30.5) scored significantly lower (P < .01) than middle/late adolescents (32.4; 31.6-33.1). In paired dyad comparisons, we observed no statistically significant difference in scores between parents/guardians and middle/late adolescents (difference, -0.2; 95% CI, -1.0-0.6). We found a statistically significant difference in scores between parents/guardians and early adolescents (difference, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.2-4.8).The capacity of adolescents-of different ages and in diverse settings-to comprehend risks, benefits, and other elements of informed consent is a critical but understudied area in research ethics. Our findings support the practice of having middle and late adolescents provide independent informed consent for sexual and reproductive health studies. Early adolescents may benefit from supported decision-making approaches.

Authors & Co-authors:  Kreniske Philip P Hoffman Susie S Ddaaki William W Nakyanjo Neema N Spindler Esther E Ssekyewa Charles C Isabirye Dauda D Nakubulwa Rosette R Proscovia Nabakka N Daniel Lee L Haba Nao N Maru Mahlet M Thompson Julia J Chen Ivy S IS Nalugoda Fred F Ssekubugu Robert R Lutalo Tom T Ott Mary A MA Santelli John S JS

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Patton GC, Sawyer SM, Santelli JS, Ross DA, Afifi R, Allen NB, et al. Our future: a Lancet commission on adolescent health and wellbeing. Lancet Lond Engl. 2016. Jun 11;387:2423–78.
Authors :  19
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.11.012
SSN : 1097-6833
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Humans
Other Terms
Eastern and Southern Africa;MacCAT-CR;adolescents;cognitive capacity;informed consent;minors;sexual and reproductive health
Study Design
Cohort Study,Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Country of Study
Uganda
Publication Country
United States