Prevention and promotion effects of Self Help Plus: secondary analysis of cluster randomised controlled trial data among South Sudanese refugee women in Uganda.

Journal: BMJ open

Volume: 13

Issue: 9

Year of Publication: 2023

Affiliated Institutions:  School of Population and Global Health, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada jura.augustinavicius@mcgill.ca. WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine, and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Veneto, Italy. Department of Mental Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. HealthRight International, Arua, Uganda. Department of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland. Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Section of Clinical Psychology, Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Global Health Section, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark.

Abstract summary 

Evidence-based and scalable prevention and promotion focused mental health and psychosocial support interventions are needed for conflict-affected populations in humanitarian settings. This study retrospectively assessed whether participation in Self Help Plus (SH+) versus enhanced usual care (EUC) resulted in reduced incidence of probable mental disorder and increased positive mental health and well-being post-intervention among South Sudanese refugee women in Uganda.This study used secondary data from treatment-oriented pilot (n=50) and fully-powered cluster randomised controlled trials (cRCT)s (n=694) of SH+ versus EUC. Data from baseline and post-intervention assessments were combined. A composite latent indicator for mental health problems was generated using mental health and well-being measures included in both cRCTs. In order to assess incidence, a binary variable approximating probable mental disorder was created to exclude those with probable mental disorder from the analysis sample and as the primary prevention outcome. The promotive effects of SH+ relative to EUC were examined in the same sample by assessing subjective well-being and psychological flexibility scale scores.A single factor for mental health problems was identified with all factor loadings >0.30 and acceptable internal consistency (α=0.70). We excluded 161 women who met criteria for probable mental disorder at baseline. Among those with at least moderate psychological distress but without probable mental disorder at baseline and with follow-up data (n=538), the incidence of probable mental disorder at post-intervention was lower among those who participated in SH+ relative to EUC (Risk ratio =0.16, 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.53). Participation in SH+ versus EUC was also associated with increased subjective well-being (β=2.62, 95% CI: 1.63 to 3.60) and psychological flexibility (β=4.55, 95% CI: 2.92 to 6.18) at post-intervention assessment.These results support the use and further testing of SH+ as a selective and indicated prevention and promotion focused psychosocial intervention in humanitarian settings.ISRCTN50148022.

Authors & Co-authors:  Augustinavicius Jura J Purgato Marianna M Tedeschi Federico F Musci Rashelle R Leku Marx Ronald MR Carswell Kenneth K Lakin Daniel D van Ommeren Mark M Cuijpers Pim P Sijbrandij Marit M Karyotaki Eirini E Tol Wietse A WA Barbui Corrado C

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Silove D, Ventevogel P, Rees S. The contemporary refugee crisis: an overview of mental health challenges. World Psychiatry 2017;16:130–9. 10.1002/wps.20438
Authors :  13
Identifiers
Doi : e048043
SSN : 2044-6055
Study Population
Women,Female
Mesh Terms
Female
Other Terms
Clinical trials;MENTAL HEALTH;PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Country of Study
Uganda
Publication Country
England