Barriers to the participation of people with psychosocial disability in mental health policy development in South Africa: a qualitative study of perspectives of policy makers, professionals, religious leaders and academics.

Journal: BMC international health and human rights

Volume: 13

Issue: 

Year of Publication: 2014

Affiliated Institutions:  Alan J. Flisher Centre for Public Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Valkenberg Hospital, Observatory, Cape Town, , South Africa. sharon.kleintjes@westerncape.gov.za

Abstract summary 

This paper outlines stakeholder views on environmental barriers that prevent people who live with psychosocial disability from participating in mental health policy development in South Africa.Fifty-six semi-structured interviews with national, provincial and local South African mental health stakeholders were conducted between August 2006 and August 2009. Respondents included public sector policy makers, professional regulatory council representatives, and representatives from non-profit organisations (NPOs), disabled people's organisations (DPOs), mental health interest groups, religious organisations, professional associations, universities and research institutions.Respondents identified three main environmental barriers to participation in policy development: (a) stigmatization and low priority of mental health, (b) poverty, and (c) ineffective recovery and community supports.A number of attitudes, practices and structures undermine the equal participation of South Africans with psychosocial disability in society. A human rights paradigm and multi-system approach is required to enable full social engagement by people with psychosocial disability, including their involvement in policy development.

Authors & Co-authors:  Kleintjes Sharon S Lund Crick C Swartz Leslie L

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  BasicNeeds. Community mental health practice. Seven essential features for scaling up in lowand middle-income countries . Bangalore: BasicNeeds; 2009.
Authors :  3
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1186/1472-698X-13-17
SSN : 1472-698X
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Administrative Personnel
Other Terms
Psychosocial disability, Rights, Participation barriers, Policy development, South Africa
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Qualitative
Country of Study
South Africa
Publication Country
England