A Comparison of South African National HIV Incidence Estimates: A Critical Appraisal of Different Methods.

Journal: PloS one

Volume: 10

Issue: 7

Year of Publication: 2016

Affiliated Institutions:  Human Sciences Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa; Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Research, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Research, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom. UNAIDS, Geneva, Switzerland. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Center for Global Health, Division of Global HIV/AIDS, Atlanta, GA, United States of America. UNAIDS, Pretoria, South Africa. Human Sciences Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa. Human Sciences Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa; Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa. Futures Institute, Glastonbury, CT, United States of America.

Abstract summary 

The interpretation of HIV prevalence trends is increasingly difficult as antiretroviral treatment programs expand. Reliable HIV incidence estimates are critical to monitoring transmission trends and guiding an effective national response to the epidemic.We used a range of methods to estimate HIV incidence in South Africa: (i) an incidence testing algorithm applying the Limiting-Antigen Avidity Assay (LAg-Avidity EIA) in combination with antiretroviral drug and HIV viral load testing; (ii) a modelling technique based on the synthetic cohort principle; and (iii) two dynamic mathematical models, the EPP/Spectrum model package and the Thembisa model. Overall, the different incidence estimation methods were in broad agreement on HIV incidence estimates among persons aged 15-49 years in 2012. The assay-based method produced slightly higher estimates of incidence, 1.72% (95% CI 1.38 - 2.06), compared with the mathematical models, 1.47% (95% CI 1.23 - 1.72) in Thembisa and 1.52% (95% CI 1.43 - 1.62) in EPP/Spectrum, and slightly lower estimates of incidence compared to the synthetic cohort, 1.9% (95% CI 0.8 - 3.1) over the period from 2008 to 2012. Among youth aged 15-24 years, a declining trend in HIV incidence was estimated by all three mathematical estimation methods.The multi-method comparison showed similar levels and trends in HIV incidence and validated the estimates provided by the assay-based incidence testing algorithm. Our results confirm that South Africa is the country with the largest number of new HIV infections in the world, with about 1 000 new infections occurring each day among adults aged 15-49 years in 2012.

Authors & Co-authors:  Rehle Thomas T Johnson Leigh L Hallett Timothy T Mahy Mary M Kim Andrea A Odido Helen H Onoya Dorina D Jooste Sean S Shisana Olive O Puren Adrian A Parekh Bharat B Stover John J

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  UNAIDS (2014) UNAIDS Gap report. Geneva: UNAIDS.
Authors :  12
Identifiers
Doi : e0133255
SSN : 1932-6203
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Adolescent
Other Terms
Study Design
Cohort Study,Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Country of Study
South Africa
Publication Country
United States