Efficacy of escitalopram in the treatment of social anxiety disorder: A meta-analysis versus placebo.

Journal: European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology

Volume: 26

Issue: 6

Year of Publication: 2018

Affiliated Institutions:  Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, South Africa. Electronic address: dsb@soton.ac.uk. Health Care Center and Department of Psychiatry, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan. Clinical Research Centre, Ohyachi Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan. Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan. H Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark.

Abstract summary 

Escitalopram is the most selective of the serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants. We conducted a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled studies where escitalopram was used to treat patients with social anxiety disorder (SAD). Data from all randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled studies in SAD with escitalopram from both specialist settings and general practice were used. Patients met the DSM-IV criteria for SAD, were ≥18 years old, and had a Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) ≥60. The primary outcome measure was the estimated treatment difference in LSAS total score at Week 12. Secondary outcome measures included the estimated treatment difference in the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) score at Week 12. A total of 1598 patients from 3 randomised controlled trials were included in the analyses. Escitalopram (n=1061) was superior to placebo (n=537), with an estimated treatment difference on the LSAS of -9.2 points (95%CI: [-14.4; -4.0], p<0.01) (escitalopram 5mg/day), -4.6 points (95%CI: [-8.1; -1.0], p<0.01) (escitalopram 10mg/day), -10.1 points (95%CI: [-13.7; -6.5], p<0.01) (escitalopram 20mg/day) and -7.3 points (95%CI: [-12.3; -2.2], p<0.01) (escitalopram 10-20mg/day). For the CGI-S, the corresponding values were -0.55 points (95%CI: [-0.79; -0.31], p<0.01) (escitalopram 5mg/day), -0.26 points (95%CI: [-0.42; -0.10], p<0.01) (escitalopram 10mg/day), -0.48 points (95%CI: [-0.64; -0.31], p<0.01) (escitalopram 20mg/day) and -0.29 points (95%CI: [-0.51; -0.07], p<0.05) (escitalopram 10-20mg/day). The withdrawal rate due to adverse events was 7.2% for escitalopram, compared with 4.3% for placebo (p<0.05). In this meta-analysis, all doses of escitalopram showed significant superiority in efficacy versus placebo in the treatment of patients with SAD.

Authors & Co-authors:  Baldwin David S DS Asakura Satoshi S Koyama Tsukasa T Hayano Taiji T Hagino Atsushi A Reines Elin E Larsen Klaus K

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations : 
Authors :  7
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2016.02.013
SSN : 1873-7862
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation
Other Terms
Efficacy;Escitalopram;LSAS;Meta-analysis;Placebo;Social anxiety disorder
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Country of Study
Publication Country
Netherlands