Promotion, prevention and protection: interventions at the population- and community-levels for mental, neurological and substance use disorders in low- and middle-income countries.

Journal: International journal of mental health systems

Volume: 10

Issue: 

Year of Publication: 2016

Affiliated Institutions:  Centre for Rural Health, School of Nursing and Public Health and School of Applied Human Sciences, University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban, South Africa. Centre for Global Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK. World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Health Promotion Research, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland. Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. School of Applied Human Sciences, University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban, South Africa ; Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, USA.

Abstract summary 

In addition to services within the health system, interventions at the population and community levels are also important for the promotion of mental health, primary prevention of mental, neurological and substance use (MNS) disorders, identification and case detection of MNS disorders; and to a lesser degree treatment, care and rehabilitation. This study aims to identify "best practice" and "good practice" interventions that can feasibly be delivered at these population- and community-levels in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), to aid the identification of resource efficiencies and allocation in LMICs.A narrative review was conducted given the wide range of relevant interventions. Expert consensus was used to identify "best practice" at the population-level on the basis of existing quasi-experimental natural experiments and cost effectiveness, with small scale emerging and promising evidence comprising "good practice". At the community-level, using expert consensus, the ACE (Assessing Cost-Effectiveness in Prevention Project) grading system was used to differentiate "best practice" interventions with sufficient evidence from "good practice" interventions with limited but promising evidence.At the population-level, laws and regulations to control alcohol demand and restrict access to lethal means of suicide were considered "best practice". Child protection laws, improved control of neurocysticercosis and mass awareness campaigns were identified as "good practice". At the community level, socio-emotional learning programmes in schools and parenting programmes during infancy were identified as "best practice". The following were all identified as "good practice": Integrating mental health promotion strategies into workplace occupational health and safety policies; mental health information and awareness programmes as well as detection of MNS disorders in schools; early child enrichment/preschool educational programs and parenting programs for children aged 2-14 years; gender equity and/or economic empowerment programs for vulnerable groups; training of gatekeepers to identify people with MNS disorders in the community; and training non-specialist community members at a neighbourhood level to assist with community-based support and rehabilitation of people with mental disorders.Interventions provided at the population- and community-levels have an important role to play in promoting mental health, preventing the onset, and protecting those with MNS disorders. The importance of inter-sectoral engagement and the need for further research on interventions at these levels in LMICs is highlighted.

Authors & Co-authors:  Petersen Inge I Evans-Lacko Sara S Semrau Maya M Barry Margaret M MM Chisholm Dan D Gronholm Petra P Egbe Catherine O CO Thornicroft Graham G

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Ngui EM, Khasakhala L, Ndetei D, Roberts LW. Mental disorders, health inequalities and ethics: a global perspective. Int Rev Psychiatr. 2010;22(3):235–244. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2010.485273.
Authors :  8
Identifiers
Doi : 30
SSN : 1752-4458
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Other Terms
Community;Low- and middle-income countries;Mental health;Population-level
Study Design
Case Control Trial,Case Study,Narrative Study,Cross Sectional Study,Quasi Experimental Study
Study Approach
Country of Study
Publication Country
England