Simulating therapeutic drug monitoring results for dose individualisation to maintain investigator blinding in a randomised controlled trial.

Journal: Trials

Volume: 18

Issue: 1

Year of Publication: 2018

Affiliated Institutions:  Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa. lesosky@gmail.com. Division of Neuropsychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa. Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, Western Cape, South Africa.

Abstract summary 

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is essential practice when dosing drugs with a narrow therapeutic index in order to achieve a plasma drug concentration within a narrow target range above the efficacy concentration but below the toxicity concentration. However, TDM with dose individualisation is challenging during a double-blind clinical trial with laboratory staff and investigators blinded to treatment arm allocation.Drug concentrations were simulated for participants in the placebo arm by an unblinded independent statistician, utilising the measured values from the treatment arm participants. Simulated and actual concentrations were re-blinded and passed on to a dose-adjusting investigator, who made dose adjustment recommendations but was not directly responsible for clinical care of participants.A total of 257 sham lithium plasma concentrations were simulated utilising 242 true lithium plasma concentrations in real time as the trial progressed. The simulated values had a median (interquartile range) of 0.59 (0.46, 0.72) compared to 0.53 (0.39, 0.72) in the treatment arm. Blinding of the laboratory staff and dose-adjusting investigator was maintained successfully.We succeeded in simulating sham lithium plasma concentrations while maintaining blinding. Our simulated values have a smaller range than the observed data, which can be explained by the challenges with respect to drug adherence and dose timing that were experienced.Pan African Clinical Trials Registry, PACTR201310000635418 . Registered on 30 August 2013.

Authors & Co-authors:  Lesosky Maia M Joska John J Decloedt Eric E

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Heaton RK, Franklin DR, Ellis RJ, et al. HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders before and during the era of combination antiretroviral therapy: Differences in rates, nature, and predictors. J Neurovirol. 2011;17(1):3–16. doi: 10.1007/s13365-010-0006-1.
Authors :  3
Identifiers
Doi : 261
SSN : 1745-6215
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Central Nervous System Agents
Other Terms
Blinding;Dose adjustment;Simulation
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Country of Study
Publication Country
England