The International Alcohol Control Study: Methodology and implementation.

Journal: Drug and alcohol review

Volume: 37 Suppl 2

Issue: Suppl Suppl 2

Year of Publication: 2019

Affiliated Institutions:  Massey University, SHORE & Whariki Research Centre, Auckland, New Zealand. Institute for Social Marketing, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK. Health Promotion Policy Research Center, International Health Policy Program, Thailand. Center for Injury Policy and Prevention Research, Hanoi University of Public Health, Hanoi, Vietnam. Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Research Unit, Medical Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa. Sheffield Alcohol Research Group, School of Health and Related Research, University Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. Centre for Alcohol Policy Research, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Lima, Peru. Public Health, Research, Education and External Affairs Department, National Center of Mental Health of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. St Kitts-Nevis National Council on Drug Abuse Prevention Secretariat, Basseterre, Saint Kitts and Nevis. RAPHA Healthcare Services North Carolina, Durham, USA. Sahmyook University, Seoul, South Korea.

Abstract summary 

The International Alcohol Control (IAC) Study is a multi-country collaborative project to assess patterns of alcohol consumption and the impact of alcohol control policy. The aim of this paper is to report the methods and implementation of the IAC.The IAC has been implemented among drinkers 16-65 years in high- and middle-income countries: Australia, England, Scotland, New Zealand, St Kitts and Nevis, Thailand, South Africa, Peru, Mongolia and Vietnam (the latter four samples were sub-national). Two research instruments were used: the IAC survey of drinkers and the Alcohol Environmental Protocol (a protocol for policy analysis). The survey was administered via computer-assisted interview and the Alcohol Environmental Protocol data were collected via document review, administrative or commercial data and key informant interviews.The IAC instruments were readily adapted for cross-country use. The IAC methodology has provided cross-country survey data on key measures of alcohol consumption (quantity, frequency and volume), aspects of policy relevant behaviour and policy implementation: availability, price, purchasing, marketing and drink driving. The median response rate for all countries was 60% (range 16% to 99%). Where data on alcohol available for consumption were available the validity of survey consumption measures were assessed by calculating survey coverage found to be 86% or above. Differential response bias was handled, to the extent it could be, using post-stratification weights.The IAC study will allow for cross-country analysis of drinking patterns, the relationship between alcohol use and policy relevant behaviour in different countries.

Authors & Co-authors:  Huckle Taisia T Casswell Sally S Mackintosh Anne-Marie AM Chaiyasong Surasak S Viet Cuong Pham P Morojele Neo N Parry Charles D H CDH Meier Petra P Holmes John J Callinan Sarah S Piazza Marina M Kazantseva Elena E Bayandorj Tsogzolmaa T Gray-Phillip Gaile G Haliday Sharon S Chun Sungsoo S Welch Miriam M Graydon-Guy Thomas T Parker Karl K

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Alleyne G, Stuckler D, Alwan A. The hope and the promise of the UN resolution on non‐communicable diseases. Glob Health 2010;6:15.
Authors :  19
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1111/dar.12650
SSN : 1465-3362
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Adolescent
Other Terms
alcohol consumption;alcohol policy;international alcohol control study
Study Design
Case Control Trial,Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Country of Study
South Africa
Publication Country
Australia