Using Theories of Change to inform implementation of health systems research and innovation: experiences of Future Health Systems consortium partners in Bangladesh, India and Uganda.

Journal: Health research policy and systems

Volume: 15

Issue: Suppl 2

Year of Publication: 2018

Affiliated Institutions:  Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, , United States of America. lpaina@jhu.edu. Institute of Development Studies, Library Road, Brighton, BN RE, United Kingdom. Department of Health Policy, Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, New Mulago Hospital Complex, Kampala, Uganda. IIHMR University, Prabhu Dayal Marg, Sanganer, Jaipur, , India. Health System and Population Studies Division, ICDDR,B, Shaheed Tajuddin Ahmed Sarani, Mohakhali, Dhaka, , Bangladesh. Quaternary Consulting, London, United Kingdom. School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa. Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, , United States of America.

Abstract summary 

The Theory of Change (ToC) is a management and evaluation tool supporting critical thinking in the design, implementation and evaluation of development programmes. We document the experience of Future Health Systems (FHS) Consortium research teams in Bangladesh, India and Uganda with using ToC. We seek to understand how and why ToCs were applied and to clarify how they facilitate the implementation of iterative intervention designs and stakeholder engagement in health systems research and strengthening.This paper combines literature on ToC, with a summary of reflections by FHS research members on the motivation, development, revision and use of the ToC, as well as on the benefits and challenges of the process. We describe three FHS teams' experiences along four potential uses of ToCs, namely planning, communication, learning and accountability.The three teams developed ToCs for planning and evaluation purposes as required for their initial plans for FHS in 2011 and revised them half-way through the project, based on assumptions informed by and adjusted through the teams' experiences during the previous 2 years of implementation. All teams found that the revised ToCs and their accompanying narratives recognised greater feedback among intervention components and among key stakeholders. The ToC development and revision fostered channels for both internal and external communication, among research team members and with key stakeholders, respectively. The process of revising the ToCs challenged the teams' initial assumptions based on new evidence and experience. In contrast, the ToCs were only minimally used for accountability purposes.The ToC development and revision process helped FHS research teams, and occasionally key local stakeholders, to reflect on and make their assumptions and mental models about their respective interventions explicit. Other projects using the ToC should allow time for revising and reflecting upon the ToCs, to recognise and document the adaptive nature of health systems, and to foster the time, space and flexibility that health systems strengthening programmes must have to learn from implementation and stakeholder engagement.

Authors & Co-authors:  Paina Ligia L Wilkinson Annie A Tetui Moses M Ekirapa-Kiracho Elizabeth E Barman Debjani D Ahmed Tanvir T Mahmood Shehrin Shaila SS Bloom Gerry G Knezovich Jeff J George Asha A Bennett Sara S

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Vogel I. Review of the Use of “Theory of Change” in International Development. London: Commissioned by the UK Department for International Development; 2012.
Authors :  11
Identifiers
Doi : 109
SSN : 1478-4505
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Bangladesh
Other Terms
Bangladesh;India;Learning by doing;Theory of change;Uganda
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Country of Study
Uganda
Publication Country
England