eHealth in Treatment of Offenders in Forensic Mental Health: A Review of the Current State.

Journal: Frontiers in psychiatry

Volume: 9

Issue: 

Year of Publication: 

Affiliated Institutions:  Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research, Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands. Department of Research, Stichting Transfore, Deventer, Netherlands.

Abstract summary 

Treatment of offenders in forensic mental health is complex. Often, these in- or outpatients have low treatment motivation, suffer from multiple disorders, and have poor literacy skills. eHealth may be able to improve treatment outcomes because of its potential to increase motivation and engagement, and it can overcome the predominant one-size-fits-all approach by being tailored to individual patients.To examine its potential, this systematic review studies the way that eHealth has been used and studied in forensic mental health and identifies accompanying advantages and disadvantages for both patients and treatment, including effectiveness.A systematic search in Scopus, PsycINFO, and Web of Science was performed up until December 2017. Studies were included if they focused on technological interventions to improve the treatment of forensic psychiatric patients.The search resulted in 50 studies in which eHealth was used for treatment purposes. Multiple types of studies and technologies were identified, such as virtual reality, web-based interventions, and videoconferencing. The results confirmed the benefits of technology, for example, the acquisition of unique information about offenders, effectiveness, and tailoring to specific characteristics, but indicated that these are not fully taken advantage of.To overcome the barriers and obtain the benefits, eHealth has to have a good fit with patients and the forensic psychiatric context. It has to be seamlessly integrated in existing care and should not be added as an isolated element. To bridge the gap between the current situation and eHealth's potential, further research on development, implementation, and evaluation should be conducted.

Authors & Co-authors:  Kip Hanneke H Bouman Yvonne H A YHA Kelders Saskia M SM van Gemert-Pijnen Lisette J E W C LJEWC

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Arboleda-Flórez J. Forensic psychiatry: contemporary scope, challenges and controversies. World Psychiatry (2006) 5(2):87–91.
Authors :  4
Identifiers
Doi : 42
SSN : 1664-0640
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Other Terms
eHealth;forensic psychiatry;interventions;offenders;technology
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Systemic Review
Country of Study
Publication Country
Switzerland