Clinical practice guideline adaptation methods in resource-constrained settings: four case studies from South Africa.

Journal: BMJ evidence-based medicine

Volume: 25

Issue: 6

Year of Publication: 2021

Affiliated Institutions:  Centre for Evidence-based Health Care, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa. Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa. Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa. Private consultant in public health on contract to South African National Department of Health, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa. Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa.

Abstract summary 

Developing a clinical practice guideline (CPG) is expensive and time-consuming and therefore often unrealistic in settings with limited funding or resources. Although CPGs form the cornerstone of providing synthesised, systematic, evidence-based guidance to patients, healthcare practitioners and managers, there is no added benefit in developing new CPGs when there are accessible, good-quality, up-to-date CPGs available that can be adapted to fit local needs. Different approaches to CPG development have been proposed, including adopting, adapting or contextualising existing high-quality CPGs to make recommendations relevant to local contexts. These approaches are attractive where technical and financial resources are limited and high-quality guidance already exists. However, few examples exist to showcase such alternative approaches to CPG development. The South African Guidelines Excellence project held a workshop in 2017 to provide an opportunity for dialogue regarding different approaches to guideline development with key examples and case studies from the South African setting. Four CPGs represented the topics: mental health, health promotion, chronic musculoskeletal pain and prehospital emergency care. Each CPG used a different approach, however, using transparent, reportable methods. They included advisory groups with representation from content experts, CPG users and methodologists. They assessed CPGs and systematic reviews for adopting or adapting. Each team considered local context issues through qualitative research or stakeholder engagement. Lessons learnt include that South Africa needs fit-for-purpose guidelines and that existing appropriate, high-quality guidelines must be taken into account. Approaches for adapting guidelines are not clear globally and there are lessons to be learnt from existing descriptions of approaches from South Africa.

Authors & Co-authors:  McCaul Michael M Ernstzen Dawn D Temmingh Henk H Draper Beverly B Galloway Michelle M Kredo Tamara T

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Birbeck GL, Wiysonge CS, Mills EJ, et al. . Global health: the importance of evidence-based medicine. BMC Med 2013;11:11(1):1 https://doi.org/ 10.1186/1741-7015-11-223
Authors :  6
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1136/bmjebm-2019-111192
SSN : 2515-4478
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Delivery of Health Care
Other Terms
mental health;primary care;public health
Study Design
Case Study,Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Qualitative,Systemic Review
Country of Study
South Africa
Publication Country
England