'Global mental health': systematic review of the term and its implicit priorities.

Journal: BJPsych open

Volume: 5

Issue: 3

Year of Publication: 

Affiliated Institutions:  Doctoral Candidate, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, USA. Program Director, Neuropsychiatric Genetics of African Populations-Psychosis Study, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, USA. Assistant Scientist, Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, USA. Research Associate, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, USA. Professor, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, USA.

Abstract summary 

The term 'global mental health' came to the fore in 2007, when the Lancet published a series by that name.To review all peer-reviewed articles using the term 'global mental health' and determine the implicit priorities of scientific literature that self-identifies with this term.We conducted a systematic review to quantify all peer-reviewed articles using the English term 'global mental health' in their text published between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2016, including by geographic regions and by mental health conditions.A total of 467 articles met criteria. Use of the term 'global mental health' increased from 12 articles in 2007 to 114 articles in 2016. For the 111 empirical studies (23.8% of articles), the majority (78.4%) took place in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), with the most in Sub-Saharan Africa (28.4%) and South Asia (25.5%) and none from Central Asia. The most commonly studied mental health conditions were depression (29.7%), psychoses (12.6%) and conditions specifically related to stress (12.6%), with fewer studies on epilepsy (2.7%), self-harm and suicide (1.8%) and dementia (0.9%). The majority of studies lacked contextual information, including specific region(s) within countries where studies took place (20.7% missing), specific language(s) in which studies were conducted (36.9% missing), and details on ethnic identities such as ethnicity, caste and/or tribe (79.6% missing) and on socioeconomic status (85.4% missing).Research identifying itself as 'global mental health' has focused predominantly on depression in LMICs and lacked contextual and sociodemographic data that limit interpretation and application of findings.None.

Authors & Co-authors:  Misra Supriya S Stevenson Anne A Haroz Emily E EE de Menil Victoria V Koenen Karestan C KC

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Kleinman AM. Depression, somatization and the ‘new cross-cultural psychiatry’. Soc Sci Med 1977; 11: 3–9.
Authors :  5
Identifiers
Doi : e47
SSN : 2056-4724
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Other Terms
Global mental health;depression;global health;mental health;psychosis
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Systemic Review
Country of Study
Publication Country
England