Modelling the impact of maternal HIV on uninfected children: correcting current estimates.

Journal: AIDS care

Volume: 32

Issue: 11

Year of Publication: 2020

Affiliated Institutions:  Centre for Rural Health, University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban, South Africa. The South African DST- NRF Centre of Excellence in Epidemiological Modelling and Analysis (SACEMA), Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa. Centre for Evidence-Based Social Intervention in the Department of Social Policy and Intervention, Oxford University, Oxford, UK. Institute for Life Course Health Research, Department of Global Health, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa. DST-NRF Centre of Excellence in Human Development, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. South African Centre for Epidemiological Modelling and Analysis (SACEMA), Stellenbosch, South Africa.

Abstract summary 

A mathematical model, populated primarily with data from South Africa, was developed to model the numbers of children affected by maternal HIV, and the number who will experience long-term negative developmental consequences. A micro-simulation model generated two scenarios. The first simulated a cohort of women whose HIV status mimicked that of a target population, and mother-child dyads by way of age- and disease-specific fertility rates. Factors defining risk were used to characterize the simulated environment. The second scenario simulated mother-child dyads without maternal HIV. In the first scenario an estimated 26% of children are orphaned, compared to 10% in the absence of HIV. And a further 19% of children whose mother is alive when they turn 18 are affected by maternal HIV. School drop-out among all children increased by 4 percentage points because of maternal HIV, similarly population level estimates of abuse and negative mental health outcomes are elevated. Relative to HIV unaffected children, HIV affected have elevated risk of poor outcomes, however not all will suffer long-term negative consequences. Interventions to protect children should target the proportion of children at risk, while interventions to mitigate harm should target the smaller proportion of children who experience long-term negative outcomes..

Authors & Co-authors:  Desmond Chris C Labuschagne Phillip P Cluver Lucie L Tomlinson Mark M Richter Linda L Hunt Xanthe X Marlow Marguerite M Welte Alex A

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations : 
Authors :  8
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1080/09540121.2020.1720587
SSN : 1360-0451
Study Population
Women
Mesh Terms
Child
Other Terms
Children affected by HIV;micro-simulation;modelling;orphans
Study Design
Cohort Study,Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Country of Study
South Africa
Publication Country
England