Debate: Why should gender-affirming health care be included in health science curricula?

Journal: BMC medical education

Volume: 20

Issue: 1

Year of Publication: 2020

Affiliated Institutions:  School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. Elma.devries@uct.ac.za. Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. Gender, Health and Justice Research Unit, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Abstract summary 

Every person who seeks health care should be affirmed, respected, understood, and not judged. However, trans and gender diverse people have experienced significant marginalization and discrimination in health care settings. Health professionals are generally not adequately prepared by current curricula to provide appropriate healthcare to trans and gender diverse people. This strongly implies that health care students would benefit from curricula which facilitate learning about gender-affirming health care.Trans and gender diverse people have been pathologized by the medical profession, through classifications of mental illness in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) and International Classification of Disease (ICD). Although this is changing in the new ICD-11, tension remains between depathologization discourses and access to gender-affirming health care. Trans and gender diverse people experience significant health disparities and an increased burden of disease, specifically in the areas of mental health, Human Immunodeficiency Virus, violence and victimisation. Many of these health disparities originate from discrimination and systemic biases that decrease access to care, as well as from health professional ignorance. This paper will outline gaps in health science curricula that have been described in different contexts, and specific educational interventions that have attempted to improve awareness, knowledge and skills related to gender-affirming health care. The education of primary care providers is critical, as in much of the world, specialist services for gender-affirming health care are not widely available. The ethics of the gatekeeping model, where service providers decide who can access care, will be discussed and contrasted with the informed-consent model that upholds autonomy by empowering patients to make their own health care decisions.There is an ethical imperative for health professionals to reduce health care disparities of trans and gender diverse people and practice within the health care values of social justice and cultural humility. As health science educators, we have an ethical duty to include gender-affirming health in health science curricula in order to prevent harm to the trans and gender diverse patients that our students will provide care for in the future.

Authors & Co-authors:  de Vries Elma E Kathard Harsha H Müller Alex A

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Snelgrove JW, Jasudavisius AM, Rowe BW, Head EM, Bauer GR. “Completely out-at-sea” with “two-gender medicine”: a qualitative analysis of physician-side barriers to providing healthcare for transgender patients. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12(1):110. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-110.
Authors :  3
Identifiers
Doi : 51
SSN : 1472-6920
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Curriculum
Other Terms
Gender-affirming health care;Health disparities;Health science education;Pathologisation;Social justice;Trans and gender diverse;Transgender
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Systemic Review
Country of Study
Publication Country
England