Process evaluation of a district mental healthcare plan in Nepal: a mixed-methods case study.

Journal: BJPsych open

Volume: 6

Issue: 4

Year of Publication: 

Affiliated Institutions:  Transcultural Psychosocial Organization (TPO), Nepal. Alan J Flisher Centre for Public Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, South Africa; and Department of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Australia. Department of Psychiatry, George Washington University, USA; and Transcultural Psychosocial Organization (TPO), Nepal. Alan J. Flisher Centre for Public Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, South Africa; and Centre for Global Mental Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK. Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Utrecht University; and Research and Development Department, HealthNet TPO, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Centre for Global Mental Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK; Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Department of Anthropology, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; and Transcultural Psychosocial Organization (TPO), Nepal.

Abstract summary 

The PRogramme for Improving Mental Health carE (PRIME) evaluated the process and outcomes of the implementation of a mental healthcare plan (MHCP) in Chitwan, Nepal.To describe the process of implementation, the barriers and facilitating factors, and to evaluate the process indicators of the MHCP.A case study design that combined qualitative and quantitative methods based on a programme theory of change (ToC) was used and included: (a) district-, community- and health-facility profiles; (b) monthly implementation logs; (c) pre- and post-training evaluation; (d) out-patient clinical data and (e) qualitative interviews with patients and caregivers.The MHCP was able to achieve most of the indicators outlined by the ToC. Of the total 32 indicators, 21 (66%) were fully achieved, 10 (31%) partially achieved and 1 (3%) were not achieved at all. The proportion of primary care patients that received mental health services increased by 1200% over the 3-year implementation period. Major barriers included frequent transfer of trained health workers, lack of confidential space for consultation, no mental health supervision in the existing system, and stigma. Involvement of Ministry of Health, procurement of new psychotropic medicines through PRIME, motivation of health workers and the development of a new supervision system were key facilitating factors.Effective implementation of mental health services in primary care settings require interventions to increase demand for services and to ensure there is clinical supervision for health workers, private rooms for consultations, a separate cadre of psychosocial workers and a regular supply of psychotropic medicines.

Authors & Co-authors:  Luitel Nagendra P NP Breuer Erica E Adhikari Anup A Kohrt Brandon A BA Lund Crick C Komproe Ivan H IH Jordans Mark J D MJD

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Whiteford HA, Ferrari AJ, Degenhardt L, Feigin V, Vos T. The global burden of mental, neurological and substance use disorders: an analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0116820.
Authors :  7
Identifiers
Doi : e77
SSN : 2056-4724
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Other Terms
Mental health;Nepal;effectiveness;integration;mhGAP Intervention Guide;primary care
Study Design
Case Study,Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Quantitative,Qualitative
Country of Study
Publication Country
England