Definitions, components and processes of data harmonisation in healthcare: a scoping review.

Journal: BMC medical informatics and decision making

Volume: 20

Issue: 1

Year of Publication: 2020

Affiliated Institutions:  Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Francie Van Zijl Dr, Parow Valley, Cape Town, , South Africa. bey-marrie.schmidt@mrc.ac.za. Division of Social and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Francie Van Zijl Dr, Parow Valley, Cape Town, , South Africa. Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA.

Abstract summary 

Data harmonisation (DH) has emerged amongst health managers, information technology specialists and researchers as an important intervention for routine health information systems (RHISs). It is important to understand what DH is, how it is defined and conceptualised, and how it can lead to better health management decision-making. This scoping review identifies a range of definitions for DH, its characteristics (in terms of key components and processes), and common explanations of the relationship between DH and health management decision-making.This scoping review identified relevant studies from 2000 onwards (date filter), written in English and published in PubMed, Web of Science and CINAHL. Two reviewers independently screened records for potential inclusion for the abstract and full-text screening stages. One reviewer did the data extraction, analysis and synthesis, with built-in reliability checks from the rest of the team. We developed a narrative synthesis of definitions and explanations of the relationship between DH and health management decision-making.We sampled 61 of 181 included to synthesis definitions and concepts of DH in detail. We identified six common terms for data harmonisation: record linkage, data linkage, data warehousing, data sharing, data interoperability and health information exchange. We also identified nine key components of data harmonisation: DH involves (a) a process of multiple steps; (b) integrating, harmonising and bringing together different databases (c) two or more databases; (d) electronic data; (e) pooling data using unique patient identifiers; and (f) different types of data; (g) data found within and across different departments and institutions at facility, district, regional and national levels; (h) different types of technical activities; (i) has a specific scope. The relationship between DH and health management decision-making is not well-described in the literature. Several studies mentioned health providers' concerns about data completeness, data quality, terminology and coding of data elements as barriers to data utilisation for clinical decision-making.To our knowledge, this scoping review was the first to synthesise definitions and concepts of DH and address the causal relationship between DH and health management decision-making. Future research is required to assess the effectiveness of data harmonisation on health management decision-making.

Authors & Co-authors:  Schmidt Bey-Marrié BM Colvin Christopher J CJ Hohlfeld Ameer A Leon Natalie N

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Liu D, et al. Harmonization of health data at national level: a pilot study in China. Int J Med Inform. 2010;79(6):450.
Authors :  4
Identifiers
Doi : 222
SSN : 1472-6947
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Delivery of Health Care
Other Terms
Data harmonisation;Health information exchange;Health information system;Scoping review
Study Design
Narrative Study,Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Country of Study
Publication Country
England