Guidance we can trust? The status and quality of prehospital clinical guidance in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review.

Journal: African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence

Volume: 11

Issue: 1

Year of Publication: 

Affiliated Institutions:  Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, South Africa. Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar. McMaster Health Forum, McMaster University, Canada. Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Stellenbosch University, South Africa.

Abstract summary 

Prehospital care is integral in addressing sub-Saharan Africa's (SSA) high injury and illness burden. Consequently, robust, high-quality prehospital guidance documents are needed to inform care. These guidance documents include, but are not limited to, clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), protocols and algorithms that are contextually appropriate for SSA. However, SSA prehospital guidance mostly originates from the 'Global North,' with limited guidance for Africa by Africans. To strengthen prehospital clinical practice in SSA, we described and appraised all prehospital SSA guidance documents informing clinical decision making.We conducted a scoping review of prehospital-relevant guidance documents, including CPGs, algorithms, protocols and position statements originating from SSA. We performed a comprehensive literature search in various databases (PUBMED and SCOPUS), guideline clearing houses (Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, Trip, and Guidelines International Network), journals, various forms of grey literature and contacted experts. Guidance document screening and data extraction was done independently, in duplicate and reviewed by a third author. Guidance quality was then determined using the AGREE II tool and data were analysed using simple descriptive statistics.We included 51 guidance documents from 13 countries across SSA after screening 2320 potential documents. The majority of guidance documents lacked an evidence foundation, made recommendations based on expert input, and were predominantly end-user presentations such as algorithms or protocols. Overall, reporting quality was poor, specifically for critical domains such as rigour of development; however, clarity of presentation was generally strong. Guidance topics were focused around resuscitation and common diseases (both communicable and non-communicable) with major gaps identified across a variety of topics; such as mental health for example.The majority of prehospital clinical guidance from SSA provides clinicians with excellent ready to use end-user material. Conversely, most of the guidance documents lack an appropriate evidence foundation and fail to transparently report the guidance development process, highlighting the need to strengthen and build guideline development capacity to promote the transition from eminence-based to evidence-based guidance for prehospital care in SSA. Guideline developers, professional societies and publishers need to be aware of international and local guidance document development and reporting standards in order to produce guidance we can trust.

Authors & Co-authors:  Malherbe Petrus P Smit Pierre P Sharma Kartik K McCaul Michael M

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  World Health Organization . World Health Organization; Geneva: 2014. Injuries and violence: the facts 2014 [Internet]https://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/media/news/2015/Injury_violence_facts_2014/en/ [cited 2020 Jun 30]. 19 p. Available from.
Authors :  4
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1016/j.afjem.2020.08.005
SSN : 2211-4203
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Other Terms
Emergency care;Guideline development;Guideline quality;Prehospital;Scoping review
Study Design
Descriptive Study,Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Country of Study
Publication Country
Netherlands