Mental health services for infectious disease outbreaks including COVID-19: a rapid systematic review.

Journal: Psychological medicine

Volume: 50

Issue: 15

Year of Publication: 2020

Affiliated Institutions:  Peking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health (Peking University), National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders (Peking University Sixth Hospital), Beijing, China. National Institute on Drug Dependence, Peking University, Beijing, China. Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. Division of Alcohol and Addiction Psychiatry, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA. Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK. Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Department of Mental Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. Centre for Global Mental Health and Centre for Implementation Science, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK. Centre for Global Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK. Peking-Tsinghua Centre for Life Sciences and PKU-IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Peking University, Beijing, China. Department of Social Work and Social Administration, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

Abstract summary 

The upsurge in the number of people affected by the COVID-19 is likely to lead to increased rates of emotional trauma and mental illnesses. This article systematically reviewed the available data on the benefits of interventions to reduce adverse mental health sequelae of infectious disease outbreaks, and to offer guidance for mental health service responses to infectious disease pandemic. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, PsycINFO, WHO Global Research Database on infectious disease, and the preprint server medRxiv were searched. Of 4278 reports identified, 32 were included in this review. Most articles of psychological interventions were implemented to address the impact of COVID-19 pandemic, followed by Ebola, SARS, and MERS for multiple vulnerable populations. Increasing mental health literacy of the public is vital to prevent the mental health crisis under the COVID-19 pandemic. Group-based cognitive behavioral therapy, psychological first aid, community-based psychosocial arts program, and other culturally adapted interventions were reported as being effective against the mental health impacts of COVID-19, Ebola, and SARS. Culturally-adapted, cost-effective, and accessible strategies integrated into the public health emergency response and established medical systems at the local and national levels are likely to be an effective option to enhance mental health response capacity for the current and for future infectious disease outbreaks. Tele-mental healthcare services were key central components of stepped care for both infectious disease outbreak management and routine support; however, the usefulness and limitations of remote health delivery should also be recognized.

Authors & Co-authors:  Yue Jing-Li JL Yan Wei W Sun Yan-Kun YK Yuan Kai K Su Si-Zhen SZ Han Ying Y Ravindran Arun V AV Kosten Thomas T Everall Ian I Davey Christopher G CG Bullmore Edward E Kawakami Norito N Barbui Corrado C Thornicroft Graham G Lund Crick C Lin Xiao X Liu Lin L Shi Le L Shi Jie J Ran Mao-Sheng MS Bao Yan-Ping YP Lu Lin L

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Agyapong, V. I. O. (2020). Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: Health system and community response to a text message (Text4Hope) program supporting mental health in Alberta. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, Apr 22, 1–2. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2020.114
Authors :  22
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1017/S0033291720003888
SSN : 1469-8978
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
COVID-19
Other Terms
COVID-19;infectious disease;mental health service;psychological intervention;tele-mental healthcare
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Systemic Review
Country of Study
Publication Country
England