The pandemic of online research in times of COVID-19.

Journal: BMJ open

Volume: 11

Issue: 2

Year of Publication: 2021

Affiliated Institutions:  Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium jeroen.deman@uantwerpen.be. Centre for Population, Family and Health, Department of Sociology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. School of Public Health, Faculty of Community and Health, University of the Western Cape, Cape town, South Africa.

Abstract summary 

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an explosion of online research using rating scales. While this approach can be useful, two of the major challenges affecting the quality of this type of research include selection bias and the use of non-validated scales. Online research is prone to various forms of selection bias, including self-selection bias, non-response bias or only reaching specific subgroups. The use of rating scales requires contextually validated scales that meet psychometrical properties such as validity, reliability and-for cross-country comparisons-invariance across settings. We discuss options to prevent or tackle these challenges. Researchers, readers, editors and reviewers need to take a critical stance towards research using this type of methodology.

Authors & Co-authors:  De Man Jeroen J Campbell Linda L Tabana Hanani H Wouters Edwin E

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  O’Connor DB, Aggleton JP, Chakrabarti B, et al. . Research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: a call to action for psychological science. Br J Psychol 2020;111:603–29. 10.1111/bjop.12468
Authors :  4
Identifiers
Doi : e043866
SSN : 2044-6055
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
COVID-19
Other Terms
COVID-19;mental health;psychiatry;public health;social medicine;statistics & research methods
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Country of Study
Publication Country
England