The impact of cash transfers on mental health in children and young people in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Journal: BMJ global health

Volume: 6

Issue: 4

Year of Publication: 2021

Affiliated Institutions:  Health Service & Population Research Department, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK annie.zimmerman@kcl.ac.uk. Alan J Flisher Centre for Public Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. Global Health and Social Medicine, King's College London, London, UK. Health Service & Population Research Department, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK. Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, Department of Health Policy, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK. Escuela de Gobierno Alberto Lleras Camargo, Universidad de los Andes, Bogota, Colombia. Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil. Programa de Pós-graduação em Distúrbios do Desenvolvimento, Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Abstract summary 

Although cash transfer programmes are not explicitly designed to improve mental health, by reducing poverty and improving the life chances of children and young people, they may also improve their mental health. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the evidence on the effectiveness of cash transfers to improve the mental health of children and young people in low-income and middle-income countries.We searched Pubmed, EBSCOhost, Scientific Electronic Library Online, ISI Web of Science and Social Sciences Citation Index and grey literature (from January 2000 to July 2020) for studies which quantitatively assessed the impact of cash transfers on mental health in young people (aged 0-24 years), using a design that incorporated a control group. We extracted Cohen's d effects size and used a random-effects model for the meta-analysis on studies that measured depressive symptoms, I statistic and assessment of study quality.We identified 12 116 articles for screening, of which 12 were included in the systematic review (covering 13 interventions) and seven in the meta-analysis assessing impact on depressive symptoms specifically. There was high heterogeneity (I=95.2) and a high risk of bias (0.38, 95% CIs: -5.08 to 5.85; p=0.86) across studies. Eleven interventions (85%) showed a significant positive impact of cash transfers on at least one mental health outcome in children and young people. However, no study found a positive effect on all mental health outcomes examined, and the meta-analysis showed no impact of cash transfers on depressive symptoms (0.02, 95% CIs: -0.19 to 0.23; p=0.85).Cash transfers may have positive effects on some mental health outcomes for young people, with no negative effects identified. However, there is high heterogeneity across studies, with some interventions showing no effects. Our review highlights how the effect of cash transfers may vary by social and economic context, culture, design, conditionality and mental health outcome.

Authors & Co-authors:  Zimmerman Annie A Garman Emily E Avendano-Pabon Mauricio M Araya Ricardo R Evans-Lacko Sara S McDaid David D Park A-La AL Hessel Philipp P Diaz Yadira Y Matijasevich Alicia A Ziebold Carola C Bauer Annette A Paula Cristiane Silvestre CS Lund Crick C

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Toye JI M. Social inclusion and community economic development: literature review. The Canadian CED Network 2004;4:Cd008137.
Authors :  14
Identifiers
Doi : e004661
SSN : 2059-7908
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Adolescent
Other Terms
child health;health economics;health policy;mental health & psychiatry;systematic review
Study Design
Case Control Trial,Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Quantitative,Systemic Review
Country of Study
Publication Country
England