Comparative Analysis of Psychology Responding to COVID-19 Pandemic in Brics Nations.

Journal: Frontiers in psychology

Volume: 12

Issue: 

Year of Publication: 

Affiliated Institutions:  Department of Psychology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil. Institute of Psychology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil. Psychology Course, Medical School of São José do Rio Preto, São José do Rio Preto, Brazil. Department of General Psychology and Behavior Analysis, State University of Londrina, Londrina, Brazil. Bee Touch, Porto Alegre, Brazil. Department of Psychology, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil. State University of Goiás (UEG) and University Center of Brasília (UniCEUB), Brasília, Brazil. Psychological Institute, Russian Academy of Education and Faculty of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia. Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India. CAS Key Lab of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Beijing, China. Department of Psychology, University of Limpopo, Sovenga, South Africa.

Abstract summary 

The BRICS Forum, an independent international organization encouraging commercial, political, and cultural cooperation between Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, was formed in 2011, and these countries have a significant influence on their regional affairs. These nations were hit by COVID-19 at different times, and all adopted home quarantine to reduce the spread of the virus. We present a comparative analysis of actions of psychology and potential outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic in BRICS nations regarding five aspects: psychology in health policies, social roles of psychology, socioeconomic context, actions for the general population, and health professionals during stage 1 of the pandemic, and possible actions in stage 2. Various types of actions were taken by psychologists in BRICS, with different levels of coordinated cooperation with respective governmental and non-governmental organizations, multiple and parallel efforts from different scientific societies, and professional regulatory agencies. Scientific societies have had an important role in coordinating some of these efforts, especially because they congregate the psychologists from different parts of these countries, improving communication and access to key information. The aim of these actions varies from improving situational skills and competences to increase the accessibility of psychological services and provide psychoeducation and telepsychology. We will consider the social importance of these actions within these countries as a global opportunity for psychology to stage in a complex context involving human health. The way psychology in BRICS will face this challenging situation is likely to produce important regional influence, stimulate scientific contribution, and increase the accessibility of psychology.

Authors & Co-authors:  de Almondes Katie Moraes KM Bizarro Lisiane L Miyazaki Maria Cristina Oliveira Santos MCOS Soares Maria Rita Zoéga MRZ Peuker Ana Carolina AC Teodoro Maycoln M Modesto João Gabriel JG Veraksa Aleksander N AN Singh Purnima P Han Buxin B Sodi Tholene T

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Agência Brasil (2020). Available online at: https://agenciabrasil.ebc.com.br/en/economia/noticia/2020-05/Covid-19-40-brazilians-faced-total-or-partial-income-loss (accessed May 26, 2020).
Authors :  11
Identifiers
Doi : 567585
SSN : 1664-1078
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Other Terms
BRICS forum;COVID-19;actions;health workers;psychology;telepsychology
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Country of Study
South Africa
Publication Country
Switzerland