A critical review of the definition of 'wellbeing' for doctors and their patients in a post Covid-19 era.

Journal: The International journal of social psychiatry

Volume: 67

Issue: 8

Year of Publication: 2021

Affiliated Institutions:  Centre for Workforce Wellbeing, Department of Psychiatry, University of Southampton, College Keep, UK.

Abstract summary 

There is no international consensus definition of 'wellbeing'. This has led to wellbeing being captured in many different ways.To construct an inclusive, global operational definition of wellbeing.The differences between wellbeing components and determinants and the terms used interchangeably with wellbeing, such as health, are considered from the perspective of a doctor. The philosophies underpinning wellbeing and modern wellbeing research theories are discussed in terms of their appropriateness in an inclusive definition.An operational definition is proposed that is not limited to doctors, but universal, and inclusive: 'Wellbeing is a state of positive feelings and meeting full potential in the world. It can be measured subjectively and objectively, using a salutogenic approach'.This operational definition allows the differentiation of wellbeing from terms such as quality of life and emphasises that in the face of global challenges people should still consider wellbeing as more than the absence of pathology.

Authors & Co-authors:  Simons Gemma G Baldwin David S DS

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Apter M. J. (2007). Reversal theory: The dynamics of motivation, emotion and personality (2nd ed.). OneWorld Publications.
Authors :  2
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1177/00207640211032259
SSN : 1741-2854
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
COVID-19
Other Terms
Wellbeing;definition;doctors
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Country of Study
Publication Country
England