Socio-economic differences in the uptake of HIV testing and associated factors in South Africa.

Journal: BMC public health

Volume: 21

Issue: 1

Year of Publication: 2021

Affiliated Institutions:  Human and Social Capabilities Research Division, Human Sciences Research Council, Buitengracht St, Cape Town City Centre, Cape Town, , South Africa. sjooste@hsrc.ac.za. Human and Social Capabilities Research Division, Human Sciences Research Council, Buitengracht St, Cape Town City Centre, Cape Town, , South Africa. University of KwaZulu-Natal, School of Nursing and Public Health, Mazisi Kunene Rd, Glenwood, Durban, , South Africa. Deputy CEO for Research, Human Sciences Research Council, Buitengracht St, Cape Town City Centre, Cape Town, , South Africa.

Abstract summary 

Improved understanding of barriers to HIV testing is important for reaching the first of the UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets, which states that 90% of HIV positive individuals ought to know their HIV status. This study examined socio-economic status (SES) differences in HIV testing uptake and associated factors among youth and adults 15 years and older in South Africa.This study used data from a national cross-sectional, population-based household survey conducted in 2017 using a multi-stage sampling design. A composite SES score was created using multiple correspondence analyses of household assets; households were classified into wealth quintiles and dichotomised into low SES/poorest (lowest 3 quintiles) and high SES/less-poor (highest 2 quintiles). Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to examine factors associated with the uptake of HIV testing in low and high SES households.HIV testing uptake was 73.8 and 76.7% among low and high SES households, respectively, both of which were below the first 90 targets. Among both low and high SES households, increased HIV testing uptake was significantly associated with females than males. The decreased likelihood was significantly associated with residing in rural formal areas than urban areas, those with no education or low levels of educational attainment and alcohol drinkers among low SES households. Whites and Indians/Asians had a decreased likelihood than Black Africans in high SES households.HIV testing interventions should target males, residents in rural formal areas, those with no or low education and those that consume alcohol in low SES households, including Whites and Indians/Asians from high SES households in order to bridge socio-economic disparities in the uptake of HIV testing. This should entail expanding HIV testing beyond traditional centres for voluntary counselling and testing through outreach efforts, including mobile testing and home-based testing.

Authors & Co-authors:  Jooste Sean S Mabaso Musawenkosi M Taylor Myra M North Alicia A Shean Yolande Y Simbayi Leickness Chisamu LC

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  UNAIDS . Miles to go. Global AIDS update. Geneva: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS; 2018.
Authors :  6
Identifiers
Doi : 1591
SSN : 1471-2458
Study Population
Females
Mesh Terms
Adolescent
Other Terms
HIV testing;Socio-economic status;South Africa;UNAIDS 90–90-90 targets
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Country of Study
South Africa
Publication Country
England