The COVID-19 pandemic as experienced by adults with congenital heart disease from Belgium, Norway, and South Korea: impact on life domains, patient-reported outcomes, and experiences with care.

Journal: European journal of cardiovascular nursing

Volume: 21

Issue: 6

Year of Publication: 2022

Affiliated Institutions:  KU Leuven Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer , Box , B- Leuven, Belgium. KU Leuven School Psychology and Development in Context, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. Department of Nursing, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea. Congenital and Structural Cardiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Research Foundation Flanders (FWO), Brussels, Belgium.

Abstract summary 

The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic poses significant challenges to many groups within societies, and especially for people with chronic health conditions. It is, however, unknown whether and how the pandemic has thus far affected the physical and mental health of patient populations. Therefore, we investigated how the pandemic affected the lives of adults with congenital heart disease (CHD), compared pre- and peri-pandemic patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and a patient-reported experience measure (PREM), and investigated whether having had COVID-19 impacted pre-/peri-pandemic differences of the PROMs and PREM.As part of the ongoing APPROACH-IS II project, we longitudinally surveyed 716 adults with CHD from Belgium, Norway, and South Korea. Pre-pandemic measures were administered from August 2019 to February 2020 and the peri-pandemic surveys were completed September 2020-April 2021. The majority of patients indicated that their social lives (80%), mental health (58%), and professional lives/education (51%) were negatively impacted by the pandemic. Patients felt worried (65%), were afraid (55%), reported the pandemic felt 'close' to them (53%), and were stressed (52%). However, differences between pre- and peri-pandemic scores on the PROMs and PREM were negligibly small (Cohen's d < 0.20). Across measures, 5.8-15.8% of patients demonstrated changes (improved or worsened scores) that exceeded the minimal clinically important difference. There were no difference-in-differences for PROMs and PREM between patients who did vs. did not have COVID-19.Although the COVID-19 pandemic has been disruptive in many ways, pre- to peri-pandemic changes in PROMs and PREM of adults with CHD were negligibly small.

Authors & Co-authors:  Moons Philip P Goossens Eva E Luyckx Koen K Kovacs Adrienne H AH Andresen Brith B Moon Ju Ryoung JR Van De Bruaene Alexander A Rassart Jessica J Van Bulck Liesbet L

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Islam N, Sharp SJ, Chowell G, Shabnam S, Kawachi I, Lacey B, Massaro JM, D'Agostino RB Sr, White M.  Physical distancing interventions and incidence of coronavirus disease 2019: natural experiment in 149 countries. BMJ  2020;370:m2743.
Authors :  10
Identifiers
Doi : zvab120
SSN : 1873-1953
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Adult
Other Terms
COVID-19;Depression;Heart defect congenital;Pandemic;Patient-reported outcomes;Quality of life
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Country of Study
Publication Country
England