Validity of Categories Related to Gender Identity in ICD-11 and DSM-5 Among Transgender Individuals who Seek Gender-Affirming Medical Procedures.

Journal: International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP

Volume: 22

Issue: 1

Year of Publication: 

Affiliated Institutions:  Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz National Institute of Psychiatry, Mexico. Virginia Commonwealth University, USA. Centro de Atención Transgénero Integral, Mexico. Condesa Specialized Clinic, Ministry of Health, Mexico. All India Institute of Medical Sciences, India. Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Brazil. EPSM Lille Métropole, INSERM - Eceve, France. University of Cape Town, South Africa. University of Pretoria, South Africa. American University of Beirut, Lebanon. Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, USA.

Abstract summary 

The most recent versions of the two main mental disorders classifications-the World Health Organization's ICD-11 and the American Psychiatric Association's DSM-5-differ substantially in their diagnostic categories related to transgender identity. ICD-11 gender incongruence (GI), in contrast to DSM-5 gender dysphoria (GD), is explicitly not a mental disorder; neither distress nor dysfunction is a required feature. The objective was compared ICD-11 and DSM-5 diagnostic requirements in terms of their sensitivity, specificity, discriminability and ability to predict the use of gender-affirming medical procedures.A total of 649 of transgender adults in six countries completed a retrospective structured interview.Using ROC analysis, sensitivity of the diagnostic requirements was equivalent for both systems, but ICD-11 showed greater specificity than DSM-5. Regression analyses indicated that history of hormones and/or surgery was predicted by variables that are an intrinsic aspect of GI/GD more than by distress and dysfunction. IRT analyses showed that the ICD-11 diagnostic formulation was more parsimonious and contained more information about caseness than the DSM-5 model.This study supports the ICD-11 position that GI/GD is not a mental disorder; additional diagnostic requirements of distress and/or dysfunction in DSM-5 reduce the predictive power of the diagnostic model.

Authors & Co-authors:  Robles Rebeca R Keeley Jared W JW Vega-Ramírez Hamid H Cruz-Islas Jeremy J Rodríguez-Pérez Victor V Sharan Pratap P Purnima Shivani S Rao Ravindra R Rodrigues-Lobato María Inés MI Soll Bianca B Askevis-Leherpeux Françoise F Roelandt Jean-Luc JL Campbell Megan M Grobler Gerhard G Stein Dan J DJ Khoury Brigitte B Khoury Joseph El JE Fresán Ana A Medina-Mora María-Elena ME Reed Geoffrey M GM

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Askevis-Leherpeux F., de la Chenelière M., Baleige A., Chouchane S., Martin M.J., Robles-García R., Fresán A., Quach A., Stona A.-C., Reed G, Roelandt J.L. Why and how to support depsychiatrisation of adult transidentity in ICD-11: A French study. European Psychiatry. 2019;59:8–14. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2019.03.005.
Authors :  20
Identifiers
Doi : 100281
SSN : 2174-0852
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Other Terms
DSM-5;Ex post facto study;Gender dysphoria;Gender incongruence;ICD-11
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Country of Study
Publication Country
Spain