Public mental health: required actions to address implementation failure in the context of COVID-19.

Journal: The lancet. Psychiatry

Volume: 9

Issue: 2

Year of Publication: 2022

Affiliated Institutions:  South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Public Mental Health Implementation Centre, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK. Electronic address: jonathan.campion@slam.nhs.uk. Department of Mental Health and Wellbeing, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK. King's Global Health Institute, Centre for Global Mental Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College, London, UK; Alan J Flisher Centre for Public Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. Association for the Improvement of Mental Health Programmes, Geneva, Switzerland. Department of Global Health and Population at the Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA. Institute of Health Equity, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, UCL, London, UK. Office of the President, Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Mental Health, Alcohol and Other Drugs Branch, Clinical Excellence Queensland, Queensland Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; Mayne Academy of Psychiatry, University of Queensland Medical School, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand.

Abstract summary 

Mental disorders account for at least 18% of global disease burden, and the associated annual global costs are projected to be US$6 trillion by 2030. Evidence-based, cost-effective public mental health (PMH) interventions exist to prevent mental disorders from arising, prevent associated impacts of mental disorders (including through treatment), and promote mental wellbeing and resilience. However, only a small proportion of people with mental disorders receive minimally adequate treatment. Compared with treatment, there is even less coverage of interventions to prevent the associated impacts of mental disorders, prevent mental disorders from arising, or promote mental wellbeing and resilience. This implementation failure breaches the right to health, has increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, and results in preventable suffering, broad impacts, and associated economic costs. In this Health Policy paper, we outline specific actions to improve the coverage of PMH interventions, including PMH needs assessments, collaborative advocacy and leadership, PMH practice to inform policy and implementation, training and improvement of population literacy, settings-based and integrated approaches, use of digital technology, maximising existing resources, focus on high-return interventions, human rights approaches, legislation, and implementation research. Increased interest in PMH in populations and governments since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic supports these actions. Improved implementation of PMH interventions can result in broad health, social, and economic impacts, even in the short-term, which support the achievement of a range of policy objectives, sustainable economic development, and recovery.

Authors & Co-authors:  Campion Jonathan J Javed Afzal A Lund Crick C Sartorius Norman N Saxena Shekhar S Marmot Michael M Allan John J Udomratn Pichet P

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Global Burden of Disease Collaborative Network Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 (GBD 2019) results. http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool
Authors :  8
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00199-1
SSN : 2215-0374
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
COVID-19
Other Terms
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Country of Study
Publication Country
England