Motivational Profiles in Unemployment: A Self-Determination Perspective.

Journal: Frontiers in public health

Volume: 10

Issue: 

Year of Publication: 2022

Affiliated Institutions:  Optentia Research Unit, North-West University, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa.

Abstract summary 

In general, being unemployed has negative implications for the individual and the mental health of the public as a collective. One way to escape this situation is to search for a job. However, following self-determination theory (SDT), unemployed people's different reasons (i.e., their motivation) for engaging in a job search influence their well-being, attitudes, and behaviors for better or worse. Some research has already supported the associations between different types of motivation and these outcomes, but less is known about how these types of motivation simultaneously associate with these outcomes. The current study addressed this issue by studying how different motivational profiles had different implications for the affective experiences, commitment to employment, and job search behavior of the unemployed. Latent profile analysis, among 865 unemployed individuals from previously disadvantaged communities in South Africa, highlighted four distinct motivational profiles: motivated, ambivalent, amotivated, and unmotivated. The motivated reported some good well-being (i.e., positive experiences) and economic outcomes (i.e., employment commitment and job search), but these came at a cost (i.e., more negative experiences). The same went for the ambivalent, but to a lesser extent. Being unmotivated seemed to have the opposite effect in that it came with psychological benefits, but with economic costs, as these individuals might withdraw from the labor market. This also applied to the amotivated, although they experienced less psychological benefit than their unmotivated counterparts. The findings made several contributions to SDT and unemployment research and could help tailor interventions and policies for particular types of unemployed people.

Authors & Co-authors:  van der Vaart Leoni L Van den Broeck Anja A Rothmann Sebastiaan S De Witte Hans H

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Arora T, Grey I, Östlundh L, Lam KBH, Omar OM, Arnone D. The prevalence of psychological consequences of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Health Psychol. (2020) 27:805–24. 10.1177/1359105320966639
Authors :  4
Identifiers
Doi : 870073
SSN : 2296-2565
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Attitude
Other Terms
attitudes;behavior;experiences;latent profile analysis;motivation;person-centered
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Country of Study
South Africa
Publication Country
Switzerland