A randomized comparison of health-related quality of life outcomes of dolutegravir versus efavirenz-based antiretroviral treatment initiated in the third trimester of pregnancy.

Journal: AIDS research and therapy

Volume: 19

Issue: 1

Year of Publication: 2022

Affiliated Institutions:  Research Department, Infectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University, Hall Lane, P.O Box , Kampala, Uganda. ochandaperez@gmail.com. Research Department, Infectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University, Hall Lane, P.O Box , Kampala, Uganda. Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK. School of Public Health & Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Abstract summary 

Evidence on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes is limited for new antiretroviral therapies (ART). Dolutegravir-based treatment is being rolled out as the preferred first-line treatment for HIV in many low- and middle-income countries. We compared HRQoL between treatment-naïve pregnant women randomized to dolutegravir- or efavirenz-based ART in a clinical trial in Uganda and South Africa.We gathered HRQoL data from 203 pregnant women of mean age 28 years, randomized to either dolutegravir- or efavirenz-based ART. We used the medical outcomes study-HIV health survey at baseline, 24 and 48 weeks between years 2018 and 2019. Physical health summary (PHS) and mental health summary (MHS) scores were the primary study outcomes, while the 11 MOS-HIV subscales were secondary outcomes. We applied mixed model analysis to estimate differences within and between-treatment groups. Multivariate regression analysis was included to identify associations between primary outcomes and selected variables.At 24 weeks postpartum, HRQoL scores increased from baseline in both treatment arms: PHS (10.40, 95% CI 9.24, 11.55) and MHS (9.23, 95% CI 7.35, 11.10) for dolutegravir-based ART; PHS (10.24, 95% CI 9.10, 11.38) and MHS (7.54, 95% CI 5.66, 9.42) for efavirenz-based ART. Increased scores for all secondary outcomes were significant at p < 0.0001. At 48 weeks, improvements remained significant for primary outcomes within group comparison. Estimated difference in PHS were higher in the dolutegravir-based arm, while increases in MHS were more for women in the efavirenz-based armat 24 and 48 weeks. No significant differences were noted for corresponding PHS scores at these time points compared between groups. Differences between arms were observed in two secondary outcomes: role function (1.11, 95% CI 0.08, 2.13), p = 0.034 and physical function outcomes (2.97, 95% CI 1.20, 4.73), p = 0.001. In the multivariate analysis, internet access was associated with higher PHS scores while owning a bank account, using the internet and longer treatment duration were associated with an increase in MHS scores.We found no important differences in HRQoL outcomes among HIV-positive women started on dolutegravir relative to efavirenz in late pregnancy. Increases in HRQoL in the first year after delivery provide additional support for the initiation of ART in HIV-positive women presenting late in pregnancy. Trial Registration Clinical Trial Number: NCT03249181.

Authors & Co-authors:  Ochanda Perez Nicholas PN Lamorde Mohammed M Kintu Kenneth K Wang Duolao D Chen Tao T Malaba Thokozile T Myer Landon L Waitt Catriona C Reynolds Helen H Khoo Saye S

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Kintu K, Malaba T, Nakibuka J, Papamichael C, Colbers A, Byrne K, et al. Dolutegravir versus efavirenz in women starting HIV therapy in late pregnancy (DoIPHIN-2): an open-label, randomized controlled trial. Lancet HIV. 2020;7(5):e332–e339. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(20)30050-3.
Authors :  10
Identifiers
Doi : 24
SSN : 1742-6405
Study Population
Women
Mesh Terms
Adult
Other Terms
ART;Dolutegravir;HIV;HRQoL;Pregnancy;Women
Study Design
Randomized Control Trial,Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Mixed Methods
Country of Study
Uganda
Publication Country
England