A Mixed-Methods Study of Risk Factors and Experiences of Health Care Workers Tested for the Novel Coronavirus in Canada.

Journal: Journal of occupational and environmental medicine

Volume: 64

Issue: 9

Year of Publication: 2022

Affiliated Institutions:  From the School of Population and Public Health (SPPH), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (Dr Okpani, Mr Barker, Ms Lockhart, Dr Delgado-Ron, Ms Yassi); Physician Occupational Safety and Health, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (Ms Yassi, Dr Grant, Ms Yassi); Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (Dr Grant); National Institute for Occupational Health, a Division of National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa (Dr Zungu); School of Health Systems and Public Health, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa (Dr Zungu); Department of Environmental Health, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa (Dr Naicker); Division of Occupational Medicine, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa (Dr Ehrlich).

Abstract summary 

The aims of this study were to investigate occupational and non-work-related risk factors of coronavirus disease 2019 among health care workers (HCWs) in Vancouver Coastal Health, British Columbia, Canada, and to examine how HCWs described their experiences.This was a matched case-control study using data from online and phone questionnaires with optional open-ended questions completed by HCWs who sought severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 testing between March 2020 and March 2021. Conditional logistic regression and thematic analysis were utilized.Providing direct care to coronavirus disease 2019 patients during the intermediate cohort period (adjusted odds ratio, 1.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.04 to 3.46) and community exposure to a known case in the late cohort period (adjusted odds ratio, 3.595%; confidence interval, 1.86 to 6.83) were associated with higher infection odds. Suboptimal communication, mental stress, and situations perceived as unsafe were common sources of dissatisfaction.Varying levels of risk between occupational groups call for wider targeting of infection prevention measures. Strategies for mitigating community exposure and supporting HCW resilience are required.

Authors & Co-authors:  Okpani Arnold Ikedichi AI Barker Stephen S Lockhart Karen K Grant Jennifer J Delgado-Ron Jorge Andrés JA Zungu Muzimkhulu M Naicker Nisha N Ehrlich Rodney R Yassi Annalee A

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Bandyopadhyay S Baticulon RE Kadhum M, et al. . Infection and mortality of healthcare workers worldwide from COVID-19: a systematic review. BMJ Glob Health [Internet]. 2020;5:e003097.
Authors :  9
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002614
SSN : 1536-5948
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
British Columbia
Other Terms
Study Design
Cohort Study,Case Study,Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Country of Study
Publication Country
United States